Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Jan-Mar;13(1):44-9.

Robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery

Megan O Schimpf  1 , Joseph R Wagner
Affiliations

Robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery

Megan O Schimpf et al. JSLS. 2009 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Background: The use of robotic assistance in adult genitourinary surgery has been successful in many operations, leading surgeons to test its use in other applications as well.

Methods: Based on our use during prostatectomy, we have applied robotic surgery to complex distal ureteral surgeries since 2004 with successful outcomes.

Results: A series of 11 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery is presented. These surgeries include distal ureterectomy for ureteral cancer with reimplantation, as well as reimplantation with and without Boari flap or psoas hitch for benign conditions.

Conclusions: Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery can be successfully applied to patients requiring distal ureteral surgery. Maintenance of the principles of open surgery is paramount.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Placement of ports for robot-assisted laparoscopic distal ureteral surgery using the da Vinci-S 4-arm system. For a 3-arm system, the most lateral robotic port on the patient's right side would be an assistant port of any trocar size. C = camera port (12 mm), R = robotic ports (8 mm), S = suction/assistant port (12 mm)
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Mufarrij PW, Shah OD, Berger AD, Stifelman MD. Robotic reconstruction of the upper urinary tract. J Urol. 2007;178:2002–2005 - PubMed
    1. Ahlering TE, Skarecky D, Lee D, Clayman RV. Successful transfer of open surgical skills to a laparoscopic environment using a robotic interface: Initial experience with laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003;170:1738–1741 - PubMed
    1. Yohannes P, Rotariu P, Pinto P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: Is there a difference in the learning curve? Urology. 2002;60:39–45 - PubMed
    1. Chang L, Satava RM, Pellegrini CA, Sinanan MN. Robotic surgery: Identifying the learning curve through objective measurement of skill. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:1744–1748 - PubMed
    1. Franco I, Dyer LL, Zelkovic P. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the pediatric patient: Hand-sewn anastomosis versus robotic-assisted anastomosis – Is there a difference? J Urol. 2007;178:1483–1486 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources