Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Aug;15(3):239-42.
doi: 10.1002/dys.389.

Gender ratios for reading difficulties

Jesse L Hawke  1 , Richard K Olson, Erik G Willcut, Sally J Wadsworth, John C DeFries
Affiliations

Gender ratios for reading difficulties

Jesse L Hawke et al. Dyslexia. 2009 Aug.

Abstract

The prevalence of reading difficulties is typically higher in males than females in both referred and research-identified samples, and the ratio of males to females is greater in more affected samples. To explore possible gender differences in reading performance, we analysed data from 1133 twin pairs in which at least one member of each pair had a school history of reading problems and from 684 twin pairs from a comparison sample with no reading difficulties. Although the difference between the average scores of males and females in these two samples was very small, the variance of reading performance was significantly greater for males in both groups. We suggest that a greater variance of reading performance measures in males may account at least in part for their higher prevalence of reading difficulties as well as for the higher gender ratios that are observed in more severely impaired samples.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Theoretical distributions of scores for males (red distribution, SD = 1.0) and females (blue distribution, SD = 0.85).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. DeFries JC, Gillis JJ. Genetics of reading disabilities. In: Plomin R, McClearn GE, editors. Nature, nurture and psychology. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association; 1993. pp. 121–145.
    1. Dunn ML, Markwardt FC. Examiner’s Manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1970.
    1. Finucci JM, Childs B. Are there really more dyslexic boys than girls? In: Ansara A, Geschwind N, Galaburda A, Albert M, Gartrell N, editors. Sex differences in dyslexia. Townson, MD: Orton Dyslexia; 1981. pp. 1–9.
    1. Geschwind N. A reaction to the conference on sex differences in dyslexia. In: Ansara A, Geschwind N, Galaburda A, Albert M, Gartrell N, editors. Sex differences in dyslexia. Townson, MD: Orton Dyslexia; 1981. pp. xiii–xviii.
    1. Harlaar N, Spinath FM, Dale PS, Plomin R. Genetic influences on early word recognition abilities and disabilities: A study of 7-year-old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 2005;46:373–384. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources