Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;19(4):358-65.
doi: 10.1007/s10165-009-0172-2. Epub 2009 Apr 16.

A new low-field extremity magnetic resonance imaging and proposed compact MRI score: evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics on rheumatoid arthritis

Affiliations

A new low-field extremity magnetic resonance imaging and proposed compact MRI score: evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor biologics on rheumatoid arthritis

Takeshi Suzuki et al. Mod Rheumatol. 2009.

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a useful tool for evaluating disease activity and therapeutic efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, conventional whole-body MRI is inconvenient on several levels. We have therefore developed a new low-field extremity MRI (compact MRI, cMRI) and examined its clinical utility. Thirteen RA patients treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) biologics were included in the study. The MRI was performed twice using a 0.21-T extremity MRI system. The MRI images were scored using our proposed cMRI scoring system, which we devised with reference to the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials RA MRI score (OMERACT RAMRIS). In our cMRI scoring system, synovitis, bone edema, and bone erosion are separately graded on a scale from 0 to 3 by imaging over the whole hand, including the proximal interphalangeal joint. The total cMRI score (cMRIS) is then obtained by calculating the total bone erosion score x 1.5 + total bone edema score x 1.25 + total synovitis score. In this study, one patient showed a progression of bone destruction even under low clinical activity, as assessed by the disease activity score on 28 joints (DAS28); however, another patient's cMRIS decreased concurrently with the decrease in DAS28, with the positive correlation observed between DeltaDAS28 and DeltacMRIS (R = 0.055, P < 0.05). We conclude that cMRI and cMRIS are useful for assessing total disease activity and as a method linking MRI image evaluation to clinical evaluation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sites evaluated in calculating the compact magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) score. In this scoring system, 23 bones and 16 joints were evaluated. Pisiforme was excluded from the wrist bone evaluation. Bone erosion and edema were evaluated in 32 sites, and synovitis was evaluated in 11 sites. The score calculation is provided in detail in Table 2
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Serial changes in disease activity score on 28 joints (DAS28) and compact MRI score (cMRIS) between first (1st) and second (2nd) MRI examinations. All patients except one had a good or moderate response to the biologics, and none showed increased disease activity. The cMRIS scores generally decreased or remained constant. However, one patient of the infliximab group showed an increase in cMRIS score even under low disease activity (dotted line)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Relationship between changes in the cMRIS value (ΔcMRIS) and changes in the DAS28 (ΔDAS28). ΔcMRIS and ΔDAS28 are the differences between the first and the second images. A positive correlation was observed between two evaluations (R = 0.55, P < 0.05)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '17985417', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17985417/'}]}
    2. Cush JJ. Early rheumatoid arthritis—is there a window of opportunity? J Rheumatol Suppl. 2007;80:1–7. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1136/ard.59.7.521', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.59.7.521'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1753194', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1753194/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10873961', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10873961/'}]}
    2. Klarlund M, Ostergaard M, Jensen KE, Madsen JL, Skjødt H, Lorenzen I. Magnetic resonance imaging, radiography, and scintigraphy of the finger joints: one year follow up of patients with early arthritis The TIRA Group. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000;59:521–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1136/ard.58.3.156', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.58.3.156'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC1752839', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1752839/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10364913', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10364913/'}]}
    2. McQueen FM, Stewart N, Crabbe J, Robinson E, Yeoman S, Tan PL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the wrist in early rheumatoid arthritis reveals progression of erosions despite clinical improvement. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999;58:156–63. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1186/ar794', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1186/ar794'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC193731', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC193731/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12932279', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12932279/'}]}
    2. Taylor PC. The value of sensitive imaging modalities in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2003;5:210–3. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1080/03009740310000058', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1080/03009740310000058'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '12737323', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12737323/'}]}
    2. Ostergaard M, Szkudlarek M. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis—why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored. Scand J Rheumatol. 2003;32:63–73. - PubMed

MeSH terms