Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 15:(2):CD000111.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub3.

Immersion in water in labour and birth

Elizabeth R Cluett  1 , Ethel Burns
Affiliations

Immersion in water in labour and birth

Elizabeth R Cluett et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Update in

  • Immersion in water during labour and birth.
    Cluett ER, Burns E, Cuthbert A. Cluett ER, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 May 16;5(5):CD000111. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000111.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018. PMID: 29768662 Free PMC article.

Abstract

Background: Enthusiasts suggest that labouring in water and waterbirth increase maternal relaxation, reduce analgesia requirements and promote a midwifery model of care. Sceptics cite the possibility of neonatal water inhalation and maternal/neonatal infection.

Objectives: To assess the evidence from randomised controlled trials about immersion in water during labour and waterbirth on maternal, fetal, neonatal and caregiver outcomes.

Search strategy: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (October 2008).

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials comparing any bath tub/pool with no immersion during labour and/or birth.

Data collection and analysis: We assessed trial eligibility and quality and extracted data independently. One review author entered data and another checked for accuracy.

Main results: This review includes 11 trials (3146 women); eight related to the first stage of labour, one to the first and second stages, one to early versus late immersion in the first stage of labour, and another to the second stage. We identified no trials evaluating different baths/pools, or the management of third stage of labour.Results for the first stage of labour showed there was a significant reduction in the epidural/spinal/paracervical analgesia/anaesthesia rate amongst women allocated to water immersion compared to controls (478/1254 versus 529/1245; odds ratio (OR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 0.98, six trials). There was no difference in assisted vaginal deliveries (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.06, seven trials), caesarean sections (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.75, eight trials), perineal trauma or maternal infection. There were no differences for Apgar score less than seven at five minutes (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.63 to 4.01, five trials), neonatal unit admissions (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.62, three trials), or neonatal infection rates (OR 2.01, 95% CI 0.50 to 8.07, five trials).A lack of data for some comparisons prevented robust conclusions. Further research is needed.

Authors' conclusions: Evidence suggests that water immersion during the first stage of labour reduces the use of epidural/spinal analgesia. There is limited information for other outcomes related to water use during the first and second stages of labour, due to intervention and outcome variability. There is no evidence of increased adverse effects to the fetus/neonate or woman from labouring in water or waterbirth. The fact that use of water immersion in labour and birth is now a widely available care option for women threatens the feasibility of a large, multicentre randomised controlled trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

Comment in

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Cammu H, Clasen K, Van Wetteren L. Is having a warm bath during labour useful? Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 1992;20(Suppl 1):104.
    2. Cammu H, Clasen K, Van Wetteren L, Derde M. ‘To bathe or not to bathe’ during the first stage of labor. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. 1994;73:468–72. - PubMed
    1. Chaichian S, Akhlaghi A, Rousta F, Safavi M. Experience of water birth delivery in Iran. Archives of Iranian Medicine. 2009;12(5):468–71. - PubMed
    1. Da Silva FM, De Oliveira SM. The effect of immersion baths on the length of childbirth labor [O efeito do banho de imersao na duracao do trabalho de parto] Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP. 2006;40(1):57–63. - PubMed
    2. Da Silva FMB, De Olivera SMJV, Nobre MRC. A randomised controlled trial evaluating the effect of immersion bath on labour pain. Midwifery. 2009;Vol. 25(issue 3):286–294. - PubMed
    1. Eckert K, Turnbull D, MacLennan A. Immersion in water in the first stage of labor: a randomised controlled trial. Birth. 2001;28(2):84–93. - PubMed
    2. Eckert KA, MacLennan AH, Turnbull DA. Immersion in water in the first stage of labour: a randomised controlled trial. 4th Annual Congress of the Perinatal Society of Australia & New Zealand; 1998 March 30-April 4; Australia: Alice Springs; 1998.
    1. Eriksson M, Mattson L, Ladfors L. Early or late bath during the first stage of labour: a randomised study of 200 women. Midwifery. 1997;13:146–8. - PubMed
    2. Ladfors L, Mattsson I, Eriksson M. Early or late tub bath during the first stage of labor: a randomized study of 200 women. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997;176(1 Pt 2):S141. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources