Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2009 Apr 15;2009(2):CD006449.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006449.pub2.

Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins to prevent staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins to prevent staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants

Prakeshkumar S Shah et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Nosocomial infection is a major problem affecting the immediate health and long-term outcome of preterm and very low birth weight neonates. More than half of these infections are caused by staphylococci. Various type specific antibodies targeted at different antigenic markers of Staphylococcus have been developed and have shown promise in animal studies.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins in the prevention of Staphylococcal infection in very low birth weight infants.

Search strategy: Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library) were searched from their inception until February 2009. In addition, abstracts of major pediatric meetings of last seven years were searched.

Selection criteria: Randomized and quasi-randomized studies of antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins for the prevention of staphylococcal infections in preterm or very low birth weight neonates were reviewed by both authors for their eligibility for inclusion. Studies of any dose and/or route were included. Quality of studies was evaluated using criteria of masking of randomization, masking of intervention, completeness of follow-up and masking of outcome assessment by both review authors.

Data collection and analysis: Data from the primary author were obtained where published data provided inadequate information for the review or where relevant data could not be abstracted. Data were abstracted independently by both review authors. Statistical methods included calculation of relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), number needed to treat (NNT) and weighted mean difference (WMD) when appropriate. Ninety five percent confidence intervals (CI) was used for these estimates of treatment effects. A fixed effect model was used for meta-analyses.

Main results: Three eligible studies were included (two studies of INH A-21 and one study of Altastaph involving a total of 2,701 neonates). Three reports of Pagibaximab were published as abstracts and will be considered for inclusion when further information is obtained. There were no significant differences noted in the risk of Staphylococcal infection between INH A-21 vs. placebo (typical RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.94, 1.22) or Altastaph vs. placebo (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.32, 2.28); the risk of other bacterial infection between INH A-21 vs. placebo (typical RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.72, 1.06) or Altastaph vs. placebo (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.53, 1.64); or the risk of any infection between INH A-21 vs. placebo (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.91, 1.09) or Altastaph vs. placebo (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.54, 1.62). There was no significant difference in the incidence of relevant secondary outcomes (chronic lung disease at 28 days, patent ductus arteriosus, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage, retinopathy of prematurity or duration of antibiotic and vancomycin use).

Authors' conclusions: Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulins (INH A-21 and Altastaph) are not recommended for prevention of staphylococcal infections in preterm or VLBW neonates. Further research to investigate the efficacy of other products such as Pagibaximab is needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Dr Kaufman was investigator for Bloom 2005; Benjamin 2006 and DeJonge 2007 studies.

Figures

1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 1 Incidence of staphylococcal infection after intervention.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 2 Incidence of other bacterial infections after intervention.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 3 Incidence of any infection after intervention.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 4 Infection related mortality prior to discharge.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 5 All cause mortality prior to discharge.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 6 Chronic lung disease.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 7 Patent ductus arteriosus.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 8 Necrotising enterocolitis.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 9 Intraventricular hemorrhage.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 10 Periventricular leukomalacia.
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 11 Retinopathy of prematurity.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 12 Duration of antibiotic use prior to discharge.
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 13 Duration of Vancomycin use before discharge.
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 14 Allergic reactions.
1.15
1.15. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 15 Pulmonary edema.
1.16
1.16. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 16 Hypertension.
1.17
1.17. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 17 Hypoglycemia.
1.18
1.18. Analysis
Comparison 1 Antistaphylococcal immunoglobulin vs. placebo or no treatment, Outcome 18 Other adverse effects.

Update of

  • doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006449

Similar articles

Cited by

References

References to studies included in this review

Benjamin 2006 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Benjamin DK, Schelonka R, White R, Holley HP, Bifano E, et al. A blinded, randomized, multicenter study of an intravenous Staphylococcus aureus immune globulin. Journal of Perinatology 2006;26:290‐5. - PubMed
Bloom 2005 {published and unpublished data}
    1. Bloom B, Schelonka R, Kueser T, Walker W, Jung E, Kaufman D, et al. Multicenter study to assess safety and efficacy of INH‐A21, a donor‐selected human staphylococcal immunoglobulin, for prevention of nosocomial infections in very low birth weight infants. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 2005;24(10):858‐66. - PubMed
DeJonge 2007 {published and unpublished data}
    1. DeJonge M, Burchfield D, Bloom B, Duenas M, Walker W, Polak M, et al. Clinical trial of safety and efficacy of INH‐A21 for the prevention of nosocomial staphylococcal bloodstream infection in premature infants. Journal of Pediatrics 2007;151:260‐5. - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Capparelli 2005 {published data only}
    1. Capparelli EV, Bloom BT, Kueser TJ, Oelberg DG, Bifano EM, White RD, et al. Multicenter study to determine antibody concentrations and assess the safety of administration of INH‐A21, a donor‐selected human Staphylococcal immune globulin, in low‐birth‐weight infants. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2005;49:4121‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Mandy 2000 {published data only}
    1. Mandy GT, Weisman LE, Horwith G, Fuller S, Fanaroff AA. Safety of a Staphylococcus Aureus (SA) Intravenous Human Immune Globulin (AltaStaph) in Very‐Low‐Birth‐Weight (VLBW) Neonates. Pediatric Research 2000;47:4.

References to studies awaiting assessment

Thackray 2006 {published data only}
    1. Thackray H, Lassiter H, Walsh W, Brozanski B, Steinhorn R, Dhanireddy R, et al. Phase II Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo‐Controlled, Safety, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Clinical Activity Study in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Neonates of Pagibaximab, a Monoclonal Antibody for the Prevention of Staphylococcal Infection. Pediatric Research E‐PAS 2006;59:3724.6.
Weisman 2003 {published data only}
    1. Weisman LE, Mandy GT, Garcia‐Prats JA, Nesin M, Schneider JH, Johnson KE, et al. Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Human Chimeric Anti‐Staphylococcal Monoclonal Antibody for Prevention of Coagulase Negative Staphylococcal Infection in Very Low Birth Weight Infants: Preliminary Report. Pediatric Research 2003;53.
Weisman 2004 {published data only}
    1. Weisman LE, Thackray HM, Gracia‐Prats JA, Nesin M, Mond J, Schneider JH, et al. Phase I/II Double Blind, Placebo Controlled, Dose Escalation, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study in Very Low Birth Weight Neonates of BSYX‐A110, an Anti‐Staphylococcal Monoclonal Antibody for the Prevention of Staphylococcal Bloodstream Infections. Pediatric Research 2004;55:4. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Adams‐Chapman 2006
    1. Adams‐Chapman I, Stoll BJ. Neonatal infection and long‐term neurodevelopmental outcome in the preterm infant. Current Opinion in Infectios Diseases 2006;19:290‐7. - PubMed
Banerjea 2002
    1. Banerjea MC, Speer CP. The current role of colony‐stimulating factors in prevention and treatment of neonatal sepsis. Seminars in Neonatology 2002;7:335‐49. - PubMed
Bell 1978
    1. Bell MJ, Ternberg JL, Feigin RD, Keating JP, Marshall R, Barton L, et al. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis. Therapeutic decisions based upon clinical staging. Annals of Surgery 1978;187:1‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Capparelli 2005
    1. Capparelli EV, Bloom BT, Kueser TJ, Oelberg DG, Bifano EM, White RD, et al. Multicenter study to determine antibody concentrations and assess the safety of administration of INH‐A21, a donor‐selected human Staphylococcal immune globulin, in low‐birth‐weight infants. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2005;49:4121‐7. - PMC - PubMed
Conner 2004
    1. Conner JM, Soll RF, Edwards WH. Topical ointment for preventing infection in preterm infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001150.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Fanaroff 1998
    1. Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, Verter J, Poland RL, Bauer CR, et al. Incidence, presenting features, risk factors and significance of late onset septicemia in very low birth weight infants. The National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1998;17:593‐8. - PubMed
Graham 2004
    1. Graham EM, Holcroft CJ, Rai KK, Donohue PK, Allen MC. Neonatal cerebral white matter injury in preterm infants is associated with culture positive infections and only rarely with metabolic acidosis. American Journal of Obstetric and Gynecology 2004;191:1305‐10. - PubMed
Gray 1995
    1. Gray JE, Richardson DK, McCormick MC, Goldmann DA. Coagulase‐negative staphylococcal bacteremia among very low birth weight infants: relation to admission illness severity, resource use, and outcome. Pediatrics 1995;95:225‐30. - PubMed
Horbar 2001
    1. Horbar JD, Rogowski J, Plsek PE, Delmore P, Edwards WH, Hocker J, et al. Collaborative quality improvement for neonatal intensive care. NIC/Q Project Investigators of the Vermont Oxford Network. Pediatrics 2001;107:14‐22. - PubMed
Kaufman 2004
    1. Kaufman D, Fairchild KD. Clinical microbiology of bacterial and fungal sepsis in very‐low‐birth‐weight infants. Clinical Microbiological Review 2004;17:638‐80. - PMC - PubMed
Kaufman 2006
    1. Kaufman D. Veronate (Inhibitex). Current Opinion on Investigational Drugs 2006;7:172‐9. - PubMed
Ohlsson 2004
    1. Ohlsson A, Lacy JB. Intravenous immunoglobulin for suspected or subsequently proven infection in neonates. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001239.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Ohlsson 2004a
    1. Ohlsson A, Lacy JB. Intravenous immunoglobulin for preventing infection in preterm and/or low‐birth‐weight infants. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000361.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Papile 1978
    1. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm. Journal of Pediatrics 1978;92:529‐34. - PubMed
Patti 2005
    1. Patti JM. Vaccines and immunotherapy for staphylococcal infections. International Journal of Artificial Organs 2005;28:1157‐62. - PubMed
Schroeder 1995
    1. Schroeder HW, Jr, Mortari F, Shiokawa S, Kirkham PM, Elgavish RA, Bertrand FE 3rd. Developmental regulation of the human antibody repertoire. Annals of New York Academy of Science 1995;764:242‐60. - PubMed
Shennan 1988
    1. Shennan AT, Dunn MS, Ohlsson A, Lennox K, Hoskins EM. Abnormal pulmonary outcomes in premature infants: prediction from oxygen requirement in the neonatal period. Pediatrics 1988;82:527‐32. - PubMed
Singh‐Grewal 2006
    1. Singh‐Grewal D, Kemp A, Wong M. A prospective study of the immediate and delayed adverse events following intravenous immunoglobulin infusions. Archives of Disease of Childhood 2006;91:651‐4. - PMC - PubMed
Splawski 1991
    1. Splawski JB, Jelinek DF, Lipsky PE. Delineation of the functional capacity of human neonatal lymphocytes. Journal of Clinical Investigations 1991;87:545‐53. - PMC - PubMed
Stoll 2002
    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Late‐onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics 2002;110:285‐91. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Stoll 2004
    1. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams‐Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low‐birth‐weight infants with neonatal infection. Journal of the American Medical Association 2004;292:2357‐65. [MEDLINE: ] - PubMed
Strunk 2007
    1. Strunk T, Richmond P, Simmer K, Currie A, Levy O, Burgner D. Neonatal immune responses to coagulase‐negative staphylococci. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 2007;20(4):370‐5. - PubMed
Vernachio 2006
    1. Vernachio JH, Bayer AS, Ames B, Bryant D, Prater BD, Syribeys PJ, Gorovits EL, Patti JM. Human immunoglobulin G recognizing fibrinogen‐binding surface proteins is protective against both Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis infections in vivo. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 2006;50:511‐8. - PMC - PubMed
Weisman 1994
    1. Weisman LE, Cruess DF, Fischer GW. Opsonic activity of commercially available standard intravenous immunoglobulin preparations. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1994;13:1122‐5. - PubMed
Weisman 2004
    1. Weisman LE. Coagulase‐negative staphylococcal disease: emerging therapies for the neonatal and pediatric patient. Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases 2004;17:237‐41. - PubMed
Weisman 2007
    1. Weisman LE. Antibody for teh prevention of neonatal nosocomial staphylococcal infection: a review of the literature. Archives de Pediatrie 2007;14:S31‐S34. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources