Prioritizing quality indicator development across the healthcare system: identifying what to measure
- PMID: 19371394
- DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01733.x
Prioritizing quality indicator development across the healthcare system: identifying what to measure
Abstract
Measuring healthcare quality has become an increasingly important task for regulating bodies and healthcare institutions. Strategically chosen quality indicators provide a means of understanding the quality and safety of the healthcare system. Current frameworks developed to determine aspects of care to be measured do not provide the level of precision required to ensure that indicators are best selected to enable focused action to improve health. We propose a clearly structured process for selecting indicators at a national and local level based on six steps: (i) identify the problem for which measurement is needed, (ii) identify the perspective from which to measure, (iii) focus measurement on transition points through the health system, (iv) identify the type of probe required, (v) apply evaluation criteria to prioritize indicator selection and action and (vi) test the indicator in the clinical setting to which it will be applied. These steps should form the basis of a framework to drive quality indicator development.
Similar articles
-
[Efficiency versus quality in the NHS, in Portugal: methodologies for evaluation].Acta Med Port. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):397-410. Epub 2009 Jan 16. Acta Med Port. 2008. PMID: 19187682 Portuguese.
-
Evaluation of the agency for healthcare research and quality pediatric quality indicators.Pediatrics. 2008 Jun;121(6):e1723-31. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-3247. Epub 2008 May 12. Pediatrics. 2008. PMID: 18474532
-
Measuring the quality of hospital care: an inventory of indicators.Intern Med J. 2009 Jun;39(6):352-60. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01961.x. Epub 2009 Mar 23. Intern Med J. 2009. PMID: 19323697 Review.
-
[Defining a set of indicators for the evaluation of healthcare needs and of the performance of local health authorities].Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2010 Mar-Apr;66(2):215-28. Ig Sanita Pubbl. 2010. PMID: 20552002 Italian.
-
Evaluation criteria for report cards of healthcare providers.Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008;19:173-89. Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res. 2008. PMID: 19548518 Review.
Cited by
-
Defining quality indicators, pharmaceutical care bundles and outcomes of clinical pharmacy service delivery using a Delphi consensus approach.Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):451-462. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01681-y. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Int J Clin Pharm. 2024. PMID: 38240963
-
System's Crisis Resilience as a Societal Crisis: Knowledge Structure and Gaze of the Finnish Health Care System.Health Care Anal. 2024 Jan 22. doi: 10.1007/s10728-023-00479-3. Online ahead of print. Health Care Anal. 2024. PMID: 38252178
-
Quality of HIV Care and Mortality Rates in HIV-Infected Patients.Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Jan 15;62(2):233-239. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ762. Epub 2015 Sep 3. Clin Infect Dis. 2016. PMID: 26338783 Free PMC article.
-
Emergency Department Navigator Interventions and Outcome Measures: A Scoping Review.Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 May;20(3):e70026. doi: 10.1111/opn.70026. Int J Older People Nurs. 2025. PMID: 40165450 Free PMC article.
-
Are performance indicators used for hospital quality management: a qualitative interview study amongst health professionals and quality managers in The Netherlands.BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 13;16(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1826-3. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. PMID: 27733194 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical