[Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight]
- PMID: 1937230
[Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight]
Abstract
To generate formulas to estimate fetal weight on the basis of sonographic measurements, 226 pregnant women were scanned within 3 days of delivery. Measurements included: biparietal diameter, head circumference and area, abdominal circumference and area, and femoral length. The contribution of each parameter to the estimation of fetal weight was tested by stepwise regression analysis. The best dependent variable was found to be the log of weight. The formula based on cranial and abdominal parameters proved to be inaccurate, especially when fetal weight was less than 2500 g. The addition of femoral length improved weight estimation, with a multiple r of 0.95174. The addition of gestational age led to even more accurate formulas. The most accurate found was based on biparietal diameter, abdominal circumference, femoral length and gestational age, with a multiple r of 0.95651 and an absolute mean error of 7.976 +/- 5.657%. It also produced better weight estimates at the 2 extremes of fetal weight.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of fetal weight estimation formulas with and without head measurements.Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Apr;67(4):569-73. Obstet Gynecol. 1986. PMID: 3515257
-
Determination of gestational age after the 24th week of gestation from fetal kidney length measurements.Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;19(6):592-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00704.x. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 12047540
-
Sonographic estimation of fetal weight based on a model of fetal volume.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):365-70. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355935 Review.
-
Ultrasonic fetal weight prediction: role of head circumference and femur length.Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Jun;65(6):812-7. Obstet Gynecol. 1985. PMID: 3889747
-
Ultrasonic estimation of fetal weight: use of targeted formulas in small for gestational age fetuses.Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Sep;82(3):359-64. Obstet Gynecol. 1993. PMID: 8355934 Review.