Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Sep;28(9):1033-40.
doi: 10.1007/s10096-009-0743-3. Epub 2009 Apr 17.

Diversity and site-specificity of the oral microflora in the elderly

Affiliations

Diversity and site-specificity of the oral microflora in the elderly

D Preza et al. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009 Sep.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to describe the bacterial diversity in the oral cavity of the elderly without root caries using bacterial microarrays, and to determine the site- and subject-specificity of bacterial colonization. Samples were collected from the tongue dorsum, mucosa of the buccal fold, hard palate, supragingival plaque from sound root surfaces, and subgingival plaque from the same roots. A new 16 S rRNA gene-based microarray method was used for the simultaneous detection of approximately 300 bacterial species. Overall, 175 species and clusters were detected, representing eight phyla. Species belonging to the genera Streptococcus, Veillonella, and Fusobacterium were common in all sites. The number of species per subject varied from 51 to 81. Statistical analyses revealed about 40 species or clusters with significant associations with at least one of the sites. The bacterial diversity was highest in the cheek and palate regions. Species typically associated with caries and periodontitis were detected rarely or not at all. The oral bacterial flora of the elderly appears to be diverse, and, to a large extent, site- rather than subject-specific.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Species with significant differences as to their prevalence at different sites. Species with p- value < 0.05 were included in the figure. The species are arranged according to their overall prevalence.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Bacterial profiles including only significant species between the different sites. The species are listed as in Fig. 1.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kazor CE, Mitchell PM, Lee AM, Stokes LN, Loesche WJ, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ. Diversity of bacterial populations on the tongue dorsa of patients with halitosis and healthy patients. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:558–563. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marsh PD, Martin MV. Oral microbiology. 3. Chapman & Hall; London: 1992.
    1. Amerongen AV, Veerman EC. Saliva--the defender of the oral cavity. Oral Dis. 2002;8:12–22. - PubMed
    1. Saltzman RL, Peterson PK. Immunodeficiency of the elderly. Rev Infect Dis. 1987;9:1127–1139. - PubMed
    1. Fure S. Five-year incidence of caries, salivary and microbial conditions in 60-, 70- and 80-year-old Swedish individuals. Caries Res. 1998;32:166–174. - PubMed

Publication types