Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance
- PMID: 19375954
- DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.027
Full-laxative versus minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CT colonography using 64-detector row CT: prospective blinded comparison of diagnostic performance, tagging quality, and patient acceptance
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: To compare prospectively 64-detector-row computed tomographic colonography (CTC) after a full-laxative tagging-based preparation (full preparation) with a minimum-laxative tagging-based preparation (minimum preparation) with respect to diagnostic performance in the detection of polyps, tagging quality, and patient acceptance.
Materials and methods: Consecutive 101 patients at high risk for developing colorectal cancer were alternately assigned to either a full preparation group (n = 51) or a minimum preparation group (n = 50) for fecal-tagging CTC. The full preparation consisted of administration of 2-L polyethylene glycol solution with 20 mL of sodium diatrizoate for fecal tagging. The minimum preparation consisted of ingestion of a total of 45 mL of sodium diatrizoate during the 3 days before and 10 mL of sodium picosulfate solution the night before CT. Colonoscopy was used as the reference standard. We assessed the accuracy of polyp detection and the tagging quality for each preparation. All patients were given questionnaires related to their acceptance.
Results: Per-patient sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for polyps > or = 6 mm were as follows: full preparation group, 97%, 92%, 88%, and 98%, respectively; minimum preparation group, 88%, 68%, 56%, and 92%, respectively. Average visual subjective tagging scores for the full and minimum preparation groups were 94.6% and 76.1%, respectively (P < .0001). Minimum preparation was better tolerated than full preparation.
Conclusion: Although full-laxative and minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CTC yielded an equally high sensitivity in the detection of polyps > or = 6 mm, the full-laxative fecal-tagging CTC yielded a better specificity than did the minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CTC. Thus, it is desirable to offer patients an option of either full-laxative fecal-tagging CTC for highest diagnostic accuracy and ability to perform a same-day therapeutic colonoscopy without additional bowel preparation, or minimum-laxative fecal-tagging CTC for those unwilling to undergo full preparation but willing to accept moderate decrease in specificity.
Comment in
-
The elephant in the room: bowel preparation for CT colonography.Acad Radiol. 2009 Jul;16(7):777-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.04.001. Acad Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19505655 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Diagnostic Performance and Patient Acceptance of Reduced-Laxative CT Colonography for the Detection of Polypoid and Non-Polypoid Neoplasms: A Multicenter Prospective Trial.Radiology. 2017 Feb;282(2):399-407. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016160320. Epub 2016 Aug 31. Radiology. 2017. PMID: 27580426
-
An interview study analysing patients' experiences and perceptions of non-laxative or full-laxative preparation with faecal tagging prior to CT colonography.Clin Radiol. 2013 May;68(5):472-8. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 21. Clin Radiol. 2013. PMID: 23265916
-
Comparative evaluation of the fecal-tagging quality in CT colonography: barium vs. iodinated oral contrast agent.Acad Radiol. 2009 Nov;16(11):1393-9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.003. Epub 2009 Jul 10. Acad Radiol. 2009. PMID: 19596591
-
CT colonography with decreased purgation: balancing preparation, performance, and patient acceptance.AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Dec;193(6):1531-9. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2342. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009. PMID: 19933644 Review.
-
The role of CT colonography in colorectal cancer screening.Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Oct;100(10):2315-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.50391.x. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005. PMID: 16181386 Review.
Cited by
-
Patients' experience of screening CT colonography with reduced and full bowel preparation in a randomised trial.Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2457-2464. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5808-1. Epub 2018 Nov 6. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30402705 Clinical Trial.
-
A novel volume-reduced CT colonography regimen using hypertonic laxative (polyethylene glycol with ascorbic acid): randomized controlled trial.Eur Radiol. 2019 Oct;29(10):5236-5246. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06127-6. Epub 2019 Mar 22. Eur Radiol. 2019. PMID: 30903329 Clinical Trial.
-
Colorectal cancer: CT colonography and colonoscopy for detection--systematic review and meta-analysis.Radiology. 2011 May;259(2):393-405. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11101887. Epub 2011 Mar 17. Radiology. 2011. PMID: 21415247 Free PMC article.
-
Pilot study on efficacy of reduced cathartic bowel preparation with polyethylene glycol and bisacodyl.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan 28;19(4):561-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i4.561. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23382637 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of two minimal-preparation regimes for CT colonography: optimising image quality and patient acceptability.Br J Radiol. 2012 Aug;85(1016):1085-92. doi: 10.1259/bjr/22421731. Epub 2012 Mar 14. Br J Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22422379 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical