Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals

Abstract

Purpose: To survey the disclosure policy for authors, peer reviewers, and editors in English-language ophthalmology journals.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Participants: English-language ophthalmology journals.

Methods: All indexed English-language ophthalmology journals were identified. The journals' websites were reviewed for published conflict-of-interest disclosure policies for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. In cases where no policy was found, the journal's editor was contacted directly to confirm if a policy existed.

Main outcome measures: The existence of conflict-of-interest policy for authors, peer reviewers, and editors.

Results: Forty-two English-language ophthalmology journals were identified. Web-based published conflict-of-interest policies were found for authors in 33 (79%), for peer reviewers in 3 (7%), and for editors in 2 (5%) of the 42 journals. After contacting those journals with no published policies, these numbers increased to 37 (100%) of 37 for authors, 18 (60%) of 30 for peer reviewers, and 10 (33%) of 30 for editors. Seven journals with published disclosure policies for authors, but not for peer reviewers or editors, did not respond to the survey, and a further 5 journals without any published disclosure policy did not respond to the survey. Journals with a higher impact factor were more likely to have a web-based published disclosure policy for peer reviewers and a disclosure policy for editors.

Conclusions: Most English-language ophthalmology journals have a conflict-of-interest policy for authors; however, they are not publicly available in 21% of journals. Conflict-of-interest policies for peer reviewers and editors are less common and are more likely not to be published compared with those for authors.

Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.