Oral versus topical diclofenac for pain prevention during panretinal photocoagulation
- PMID: 19376588
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2009.01.022
Oral versus topical diclofenac for pain prevention during panretinal photocoagulation
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the effect of pretreatment oral and topical diclofenac on pain reduction during panretinal laser photocoagulation (PRP) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR).
Design: Prospective, randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled clinical trial.
Participants and controls: A total of 90 patients with PDR requiring PRP for the first time were assigned randomly to 1 of 3 study groups: oral diclofenac (n = 30), topical diclofenac (n = 31), or placebo (n = 29).
Methods: Study medications were administrated before the first PRP treatment, and pain levels experienced during and 15 minutes after PRP were recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS). Pain levels during a second PRP session, performed on a later date with no pretreatment medications, also were recorded on a VAS.
Main outcome measures: The primary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP treatment. Secondary outcome measures were the mean VAS pain scores 15 minutes after the first PRP and during the second PRP, and reported side effects after the first PRP.
Results: Mean VAS pain scores during the first PRP were: oral diclofenac, 25.7+/-19.9; topical diclofenac, 33.8+/-27.9; and placebo, 41.3+/-31.0. The pain score difference between oral diclofenac and placebo was both clinically significant (>or=13) and statistically significant (P = 0.02), whereas differences between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.20) and topical diclofenac and placebo (P = 0.33) were not. Multivariate regression analysis for age, gender, and total laser energy demonstrated lower pain levels for both oral diclofenac (P = 0.015) and topical diclofenac (P<0.0001) versus placebo, but no difference between oral and topical diclofenac (P = 0.67). For the first PRP, all 3 groups had lower mean pain scores at 15 minutes after treatment compared with during treatment (P<or=0.0003). Mean pain scores were higher during the second compared with the first PRP for the oral diclofenac (P = 0.02) and placebo (P = 0.05) groups. No significant rate difference for any side effect was found between groups.
Conclusions: When given in a single dose, oral diclofenac is an effective pretreatment analgesic agent for reducing the pain experienced during PRP for PDR.
Financial disclosure(s): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
Similar articles
-
Interventions for relieving pain associated with panretinal photocoagulation: a prospective randomized trial.Eye (Lond). 2006 Jun;20(6):712-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.eye.6701989. Epub 2005 Jul 8. Eye (Lond). 2006. PMID: 16021194 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with buprenorphine and morphine alone and in combination during the first 12 postoperative hours: a randomized, double-blind, four-arm trial in adults undergoing abdominal surgery.Clin Ther. 2009 Mar;31(3):527-41. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.03.018. Clin Ther. 2009. PMID: 19393843 Clinical Trial.
-
Equivalence study of a topical diclofenac solution (pennsaid) compared with oral diclofenac in symptomatic treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee: a randomized controlled trial.J Rheumatol. 2004 Oct;31(10):2002-12. J Rheumatol. 2004. PMID: 15468367 Clinical Trial.
-
Pain responses of Pascal 20 ms multi-spot and 100 ms single-spot panretinal photocoagulation: Manchester Pascal Study, MAPASS report 2.Br J Ophthalmol. 2010 Nov;94(11):1493-8. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2009.176677. Epub 2010 Jun 16. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010. PMID: 20558423 Review.
-
A Comprehensive Meta-Analysis on the Role of Analgesics and Anti-Inflammatories in Pan-Retinal Photocoagulation.Am J Ophthalmol. 2024 Nov;267:112-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Jun 26. Am J Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38942228
Cited by
-
Pain score of patients undergoing single spot, short pulse laser versus conventional laser for diabetic retinopathy.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013 Apr;251(4):1103-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-2167-5. Epub 2012 Oct 11. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2013. PMID: 23052718 Clinical Trial.
-
Changes in pupil size following panretinal retinal photocoagulation: conventional laser vs pattern scan laser (PASCAL).Eye (Lond). 2016 Oct;30(10):1359-1364. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.135. Epub 2016 Jul 8. Eye (Lond). 2016. PMID: 27391936 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Pain Scores Among Patients Undergoing Conventional and Novel Panretinal Photocoagulation for Diabetic Retinopathy: A Systematic Review.Clin Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 2;15:953-971. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S294227. eCollection 2021. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021. PMID: 33688163 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The efficacy of oral pain relief cocktail during pan-retinal photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial.Int J Retina Vitreous. 2023 Feb 2;9(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40942-022-00438-5. Int J Retina Vitreous. 2023. PMID: 36732865 Free PMC article.
-
PASCAL laser platform produces less pain responses compared to conventional laser system during the panretinal photocoagulation: a randomized clinical trial.Afr Health Sci. 2018 Dec;18(4):1010-1017. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v18i4.22. Afr Health Sci. 2018. PMID: 30766567 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials