Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation
- PMID: 19378412
Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation
Abstract
The finding that the Ebbinghaus/Titchener illusion deceives perception but not grasping is usually seen as strong evidence for Goodale and Milner's (1992) notion of two parallel visual systems, one being conscious and deceived by the illusion (vision-for-perception) and the other being unconscious and not deceived (vision-for-action). However, this finding is controversial and led to studies with seemingly contradictory results. We argue that these results are not as contradictory as it might seem. Instead, studies consistently show similar effects of the illusion on grasping. The perceptual effects are strongly dependent on the specific perceptual measure employed. If, however, some methodological precautions are used, then these diverse perceptual results can be reconciled and point to a single internal size estimate that is used for perception and for grasping. This suggests that the Ebbinghaus illusion deceives a common representation of object size that is used by perception and action.
Comment in
-
Consistency in exchange for inappropriately matched visual feedback? A comment on Franz and Gegenfurtner (2008) "Grasping visual illusions: consistent data and no dissociation".Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009 Jun;26(4):412-7. doi: 10.1080/02643290903135750. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2009. PMID: 19672734
Similar articles
-
Grasping visual illusions: Consistent data and no dissociation.Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008 Oct;25(7):920-50. doi: 10.1080/02643290701862449. Epub 2008 Jun 13. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2008. PMID: 18629739
-
Another look at the Müller-Lyer illusion: different gaze patterns in vision for action and perception.Neuropsychologia. 2009 Feb;47(3):804-12. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.12.003. Epub 2008 Dec 11. Neuropsychologia. 2009. PMID: 19118565
-
Visual illusions, delayed grasping, and memory: no shift from dorsal to ventral control.Neuropsychologia. 2009 May;47(6):1518-31. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.08.029. Epub 2008 Sep 11. Neuropsychologia. 2009. PMID: 18834894
-
When is grasping affected by the Müller-Lyer illusion? A quantitative review.Neuropsychologia. 2009 May;47(6):1421-33. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.031. Epub 2008 Nov 19. Neuropsychologia. 2009. PMID: 19059422 Review.
-
Effects of visual illusions on grasping.J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001 Oct;27(5):1124-44. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2001. PMID: 11642699 Review.
Cited by
-
Deceptive illusory cues can influence orthogonally directed manual length estimations.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Feb;87(2):588-603. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02991-7. Epub 2025 Jan 13. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025. PMID: 39806078 Free PMC article.
-
Visual illusions influence proceduralized sports performance.Psychon Bull Rev. 2023 Feb;30(1):174-183. doi: 10.3758/s13423-022-02145-6. Epub 2022 Jul 25. Psychon Bull Rev. 2023. PMID: 35879591
-
Bimanual Grasping Adheres to Weber's Law.Iperception. 2021 Nov 25;12(6):20416695211054534. doi: 10.1177/20416695211054534. eCollection 2021 Nov. Iperception. 2021. PMID: 34868538 Free PMC article.
-
Obstacle avoidance of physical, stereoscopic, and pictorial objects.Virtual Real. 2025;29(1):45. doi: 10.1007/s10055-025-01119-y. Epub 2025 Mar 1. Virtual Real. 2025. PMID: 40041039 Free PMC article.
-
Locomotor adaptation versus perceptual adaptation when stepping over an obstacle with a height illusion.PLoS One. 2010 Jul 12;5(7):e11544. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011544. PLoS One. 2010. PMID: 20634962 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.