Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;96(5):933-48.
doi: 10.1037/a0014747.

Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning

Affiliations

Implicit misattribution as a mechanism underlying evaluative conditioning

Christopher R Jones et al. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Evaluative conditioning (EC) refers to the formation or change of an attitude toward an object, following that object's pairing with positively or negatively valenced stimuli. The authors provide evidence that EC can occur through an implicit misattribution mechanism in which an evaluative response evoked by a valenced stimulus is incorrectly and implicitly attributed to another stimulus, forming or changing an attitude toward this other stimulus. In 5 studies, the authors measured or manipulated variables related to the potential for the misattribution of an evaluation, or source confusability. Greater EC was observed when participants' eye gaze shifted frequently between a valenced and a neutral stimulus (Studies 1 & 2), when the 2 stimuli appeared in close spatial proximity (Study 3), and when the neutral stimulus was made more perceptually salient than was the valenced stimulus, due to the larger size of the neutral stimulus (Study 4). In other words, conditions conducive to source confusability increased EC. Study 5 provided evidence for multiple mechanisms of EC by comparing the effects of mildly evocative valenced stimuli (those evoking responses that might more easily be misattributed to another object) with more strongly evocative stimuli.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ashby FG, Prinzmetal W, Ivry R, Maddox T. A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychological Review. 1996;103:165–192. - PubMed
    1. Baeyens F, Crombez G, Van den Bergh O, Eelen P. Once in contact always in contact: Evaluative conditioning is resistant to extinction. Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy. 1988;10:179–199.
    1. Baeyens F, Eelen P, Crombez G, Van den Bergh O. Human evaluative conditioning: A case for unaware affective-evaluative learning. Cognition and Emotion. 1992;4:3–18.
    1. Baeyens F, Hermans D, Eelen P. The role of CS-US contingency in human evaluative conditioning. Behavior Research and Therapy. 1993;31:731–737. - PubMed
    1. Baeyens F, Vansteenwegen D, Hermans D, Eelen P. Chilled white wine, when all of a sudden the doorbell rings: Mere reference and evaluation versus expectancy and preparation in human Pavlovian learning. In: Columbus F, editor. Advances in Psychology Research. Vol. 4. New York: Nova; 2001. pp. 241–277.

Publication types