Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading
- PMID: 19379050
- PMCID: PMC2844803
- DOI: 10.1037/a0015123
Phonological typicality does not influence fixation durations in normal reading
Abstract
Using a word-by-word self-paced reading paradigm, T. A. Farmer, M. H. Christiansen, and P. Monaghan (2006) reported faster reading times for words that are phonologically typical for their syntactic category (i.e., noun or verb) than for words that are phonologically atypical. This result has been taken to suggest that language users are sensitive to subtle relationships between sound and syntactic function and that they make rapid use of this information in comprehension. The present article reports attempts to replicate this result using both eyetracking during normal reading (Experiment 1) and word-by-word self-paced reading (Experiment 2). No hint of a phonological typicality effect emerged on any reading-time measure in Experiment 1, nor did Experiment 2 replicate Farmer et al.'s finding from self-paced reading. Indeed, the differences between condition means were not consistently in the predicted direction, as phonologically atypical verbs were read more quickly than phonologically typical verbs, on most measures. Implications for research on visual word recognition are discussed.
Copyright 2009 APA, all rights reserved.
Figures
Comment in
-
Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1318-25. doi: 10.1037/a0023063. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21895396
Similar articles
-
Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1326-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024193. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21895397 Free PMC article.
-
Phonological typicality influences sentence processing in predictive contexts: reply to Staub, Grant, Clifton, and Rayner (2009).J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1318-25. doi: 10.1037/a0023063. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21895396
-
Phonological typicality and sentence processing.Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Mar;11(3):93-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.010. Epub 2007 Jan 4. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007. PMID: 17207653
-
The effect of phonological neighborhood density on eye movements during reading.Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.020. Epub 2007 Sep 10. Cognition. 2008. PMID: 17826758
-
Parafoveal processing in reading.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Jan;74(1):5-35. doi: 10.3758/s13414-011-0219-2. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012. PMID: 22042596 Review.
Cited by
-
Multi-voxel pattern analysis of noun and verb differences in ventral temporal cortex.Brain Lang. 2014 Oct;137:40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.009. Epub 2014 Aug 24. Brain Lang. 2014. PMID: 25156159 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Specificity of Sound Symbolic Correspondences in Spoken Language.Cogn Sci. 2017 Nov;41(8):2191-2220. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12474. Epub 2016 Dec 29. Cogn Sci. 2017. PMID: 28032652 Free PMC article.
-
Still no phonological typicality effect on word reading time (and no good explanation of one, either): a rejoinder to Farmer, Monaghan, Misyak, and Christiansen.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Sep;37(5):1326-8. doi: 10.1037/a0024193. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011. PMID: 21895397 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Lexical Variables on Silent Reading Comprehension in Individuals With Aphasia: Evidence From Eye Tracking.J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Sep 18;60(9):2589-2602. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-16-0045. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017. PMID: 28863409 Free PMC article.
-
Hyper-active gap filling.Front Psychol. 2015 Apr 10;6:384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00384. eCollection 2015. Front Psychol. 2015. PMID: 25914658 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Baayen RH. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A practical introduction to statistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
-
- Baayen R, Piepenbrock R, Gulikers L. The CELEX Lexical Database. Philadelphia: Linguistic Data Consortium; 1995.
-
- Baayen RH, Davidson DH, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language. 2008;59:390–412.
-
- Balota DA, Chumbley JI. Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1984;10:340–357. - PubMed
-
- Balota DA, Chumbley JI. The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language. 1985;24:89–106.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous