Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May 5;106(18):7351-6.
doi: 10.1073/pnas.0808187106. Epub 2009 Apr 20.

Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex

Affiliations

Flexible neural mechanisms of cognitive control within human prefrontal cortex

Todd S Braver et al. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. .

Abstract

A major challenge in research on executive control is to reveal its functional decomposition into underlying neural mechanisms. A typical assumption is that this decomposition occurs solely through anatomically based dissociations. Here we tested an alternative hypothesis that different cognitive control processes may be implemented within the same brain regions, with fractionation and dissociation occurring on the basis of temporal dynamics. Regions within lateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) were examined that, in a prior study, exhibited contrasting temporal dynamics between older and younger adults during performance of the AX-CPT cognitive control task. The temporal dynamics in younger adults fit a proactive control pattern (primarily cue-based activation), whereas in older adults a reactive control pattern was found (primarily probe-based activation). In the current study, we found that following a period of task-strategy training, these older adults exhibited a proactive shift within a subset of the PFC regions, normalizing their activity dynamics toward young adult patterns. Conversely, under conditions of penalty-based monetary incentives, the younger adults exhibited a reactive shift some of the same regions, altering their temporal dynamics toward the older adult baseline pattern. These experimentally induced crossover patterns of temporal dynamics provide strong support for dual modes of cognitive control that can be flexibly shifted within PFC regions, via modulation of neural responses to changing task conditions or behavioral goals.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
(A) The set of 17 age-related crossover ROIs originally reported in ref. . (B) Activation dynamics during trial for younger and older adults (averaged across all ROIs). Older adults show reduced cue-related but increased probe-related activity, associated with a reactive control mode.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
(A) The set of 4 regions demonstrating training-related proactive shift (increased cue-related activity, decreased probe-related activity) in older adults and penalty-related reactive shift (decreased cue-related activity, increased probe-related activity) in young adults. The right side of the image is the right side of the brain, and the left side of the image is the left side of the brain. The region in red is the left middle frontal gyrus (BA 9/46; x = −35, y = 44, z = 32); yellow is the medial superior frontal gyrus (BA 6; x = −46, y = −7, z = 41). Two right inferior frontal junction regions (BA 44/6) are in green (x = 39, y = 6, z = 33) and blue (x = 53, y = 6, z = 36). (B) Activation dynamics for older adults at baseline and posttest conditions in 4 regions identified in (A). (C) Activation dynamics for young adults at baseline and penalty conditions in 4 regions identified in (A). (D) Shift from sustained to primarily cue-related to primarily probe-related activation dynamics in right IFJ across reward, baseline and penalty AX-CPT conditions, respectively. Cue and probe activation computed by average of time points 3–4 (cue) and 5–6 (probe). Inset shows location of contiguous right IFJ regions showing penalty-related reactive pattern (blue) and reward-related sustained proactive pattern (red).

References

    1. Rougier NP, Noelle DC, Braver TS, Cohen JD, O'Reilly RC. Prefrontal cortex and flexible cognitive control: Rules without symbols. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;102:7338–7343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Koechlin E, Ody C, Kouneiher F. The architecture of cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex. Science. 2003;302:1181–1185. - PubMed
    1. Braver TS, Gray JR, Burgess GC. In: Variation in Working Memory. Conway ARA, Jarrold C, Kane MJ, Miyake A, Towse J, editors. Oxford: Oxford Univ Press; 2007. pp. 76–106.
    1. Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;21:167–202. - PubMed
    1. Jacoby LL, Kelley CM, McElree BD. In: Dual Process Theories in Social Psychology. Chaiken S, Trope E, editors. New York: Guildford; 1999. pp. 383–400.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources