CT scans and acute appendicitis: a five-year analysis from a rural teaching hospital
- PMID: 19381736
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-0875-x
CT scans and acute appendicitis: a five-year analysis from a rural teaching hospital
Abstract
Introduction: Studies examining the relationship between computed tomography (CT) scans and appendiceal perforation have largely been conducted in urban centers. The present study sought to evaluate this relationship in a rural hospital.
Methods and procedures: This is a retrospective analysis of 445 patients who underwent appendectomies from January 2000 to June 2005 at a rural teaching hospital.
Results: Four hundred forty-five patients were analyzed in two groups; those who underwent CT scans (N = 245) and those who did not (N = 200). Patients undergoing CT scans were significantly older (median age 38 vs. 22 years, P < 0.0001), were more likely to have perforated appendicitis (P 0.001), were less likely to undergo a negative appendectomy (P = 0.003), and had a significantly longer length of stay than those who did not (P 0.009). Analysis by gender showed that perforation rates continued to be significantly higher in males undergoing CT scans (P 0.004). To examine the possibility that sicker patients were more likely to receive CT scans and also be found to have perforated appendicitis, a sensitivity analysis was performed. Patients showing perforated appendicitis on initial CT scans were excluded and the analysis was repeated. The difference in perforation rates continued to remain significant (P 0.037).
Conclusion: Males undergoing CT scans are significantly more likely to have perforated appendicitis. A protocol-driven rational approach to CT evaluation of suspected appendicitis may lower perforation rates, especially in males.
Similar articles
-
Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender.J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jul;15(7):1223-31. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1486-x. Epub 2011 May 10. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011. PMID: 21557019
-
Trends in the Management of Acute Appendicitis in a Single-Center Quality Register Cohort of 5,614 Patients.Dig Surg. 2018;35(2):144-154. doi: 10.1159/000477269. Epub 2017 Jun 24. Dig Surg. 2018. PMID: 28647737
-
Determination of surgical priorities in appendicitis based on the probability of undetected appendiceal perforation.World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb 21;21(7):2131-9. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i7.2131. World J Gastroenterol. 2015. PMID: 25717248 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnosis of acute appendicitis in a pediatric population: to CT or not to CT.J Pediatr Surg. 2003 Mar;38(3):367-71; discsussion 367-71. doi: 10.1053/jpsu.2003.50110. J Pediatr Surg. 2003. PMID: 12632351 Review.
-
Appendectomy: a contemporary appraisal.Ann Surg. 1997 Mar;225(3):252-61. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199703000-00003. Ann Surg. 1997. PMID: 9060580 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Characteristics of perforated appendicitis: effect of delay is confounded by age and gender.J Gastrointest Surg. 2011 Jul;15(7):1223-31. doi: 10.1007/s11605-011-1486-x. Epub 2011 May 10. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011. PMID: 21557019
-
Treatment options of inflammatory appendiceal masses in adults.World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul 7;19(25):3942-50. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i25.3942. World J Gastroenterol. 2013. PMID: 23840138 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Is Emergency Appendicectomy Better Than Elective Appendicectomy for the Treatment of Appendiceal Phlegmon?: A Review.Cureus. 2020 Dec 12;12(12):e12045. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12045. Cureus. 2020. PMID: 33447475 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for acute appendicitis: a meta-analysis.World J Surg. 2010 Feb;34(2):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0343-5. World J Surg. 2010. PMID: 20041249
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical