Bilateral paediatric cochlear implants: a critical review
- PMID: 19382017
- DOI: 10.1080/14992020802665967
Bilateral paediatric cochlear implants: a critical review
Abstract
A recent trend has been the implantation of bilateral cochlear implants (CIs) for children with severe to profound hearing loss. A review of available research on bilateral CIs was conducted to determine the support for this trend. A replicable review was undertaken to evaluate published research studies that examined the effectiveness of bilateral paediatric cochlear implantation. Databases, reference lists, and journals were searched for relevant documents using a pre-determined search protocol. Twenty-nine articles met the review's inclusion criteria and were retrieved and reviewed. This review adds to the previously published reviews on the topic by identifying additional paediatric studies. Sound localization and speech recognition in noise appear to be improved with bilateral compared to unilateral cochlear implants. Similarly, evoked potential measures suggest improved morphology when the second CI is implanted early. Well-designed and controlled studies that explore a variety of outcomes including cost-effectiveness, quality of life, speech, language, and psycho-educational measures should be further explored in order to provide additional support for parents and clinicians confronted with the bilateral cochlear implant decision.
Similar articles
-
Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.Ear Hear. 2007 Aug;28(4):470-82. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e31806dc194. Ear Hear. 2007. PMID: 17609610
-
1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.Otol Neurotol. 2007 Aug;28(5):589-96. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318067bd24. Otol Neurotol. 2007. PMID: 17667768
-
Subjective and objective results after bilateral cochlear implantation in adults.Otol Neurotol. 2009 Apr;30(3):313-8. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31819bd7e6. Otol Neurotol. 2009. PMID: 19318885
-
Benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation: a review.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Oct;15(5):315-8. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3282ef3d3e. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007. PMID: 17823546 Review.
-
Bilateral cochlear implantation: current concepts.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Oct;17(5):351-5. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0b013e3283301702. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009. PMID: 19606037 Review.
Cited by
-
Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implants in children: a study of spoken language outcomes.Ear Hear. 2014 Jul-Aug;35(4):396-409. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000022. Ear Hear. 2014. PMID: 24557003 Free PMC article.
-
Highly stable carbon nanotube doped poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) for chronic neural stimulation.Biomaterials. 2011 Aug;32(24):5551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.04.051. Epub 2011 May 20. Biomaterials. 2011. PMID: 21601278 Free PMC article.
-
A case study assessing the auditory and speech development of four children implanted with cochlear implants by the chronological age of 12 months.Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2013;2013:359218. doi: 10.1155/2013/359218. Epub 2013 Feb 20. Case Rep Otolaryngol. 2013. PMID: 23509653 Free PMC article.
-
Cochlear implantation in nontraditional candidates: preliminary results in adolescents with asymmetric hearing loss.Otol Neurotol. 2013 Apr;34(3):408-15. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31827850b8. Otol Neurotol. 2013. PMID: 23222962 Free PMC article.
-
Advanced strategies to thwart foreign body response to implantable devices.Bioeng Transl Med. 2022 Mar 2;7(3):e10300. doi: 10.1002/btm2.10300. eCollection 2022 Sep. Bioeng Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36176611 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous