Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;77(1):52-61.
doi: 10.1002/prot.22415.

Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes

Affiliations

Automated site preparation in physics-based rescoring of receptor ligand complexes

Chaya S Rapp et al. Proteins. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

Hydrogen atoms are not typically observable in X-ray crystal structures, but inferring their locations is often important in structure-based drug design. In addition, protonation states of the protein can change in response to ligand binding, as can the orientations of OH groups, a subtle form of "induced fit." We implement and evaluate an automated procedure for optimizing polar hydrogens in protein-binding sites in complex with ligands. Specifically, we apply the previously described Independent Cluster Decomposition Algorithm (ICDA) algorithm (Li et al., Proteins 2007;66:824-837), which assigns the ionization states of titratable residues, the amide orientations of Asn/Gln side chains, the imidazole ring orientation in His, and the orientations of OH/SH groups, in a unified algorithm. We test the utility of this method for identifying nativelike ligand poses using 247 protein-ligand complexes from an established database of docked decoys. Pose selection is performed with a physics-based scoring function based on a molecular mechanics energy function and a Generalized Born implicit solvent model. The use of the ICDA receptor preparation protocol, implemented with no knowledge of the native ligand pose, increases the accuracy of pose selection significantly, with the average RMSD over all complexes decreasing from 2.7 to 1.5 A when applying ICDA. Large improvements are seen for specific classes of binding sites with titratable groups, such as aspartyl proteases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percent of complexes with given RMSD for selected pose using default, “biased” ICDA, and “unbiased” ICDA protocols.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Ligand surrounded by receptor residues with ICDA-predicted changes in protonation state for aspartyl proteases a) 1aaq (HIV protease), in which only Asp 25′ is protonated; b) 1hos (HIV protease) in which both Asp 25 and Asp 25′ are protonated; and c) penicillopepsin, 1ppk, showing a diprotonated state characteristic of phosphinate and phosphonate inhibitors. CPK color scheme is used with green carbon atoms and grey polar hydrogen atoms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
In PDB structure 1cny, the ligand (red) protrudes out of the receptor (grey) into solvent.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Chen H, Lyne PD, Giordanetto P, Lovell T, Li J. On Evaluating Molecular-Docking Methods for Pose Prediction and Enrichment Factors. J Chem Inf Model. 2006;46(1):401–415. - PubMed
    1. Carlsson J, Boukharta L, Aqvist J. Combining docking, molecular dynamics and the linear interaction energy method to predict binding modes and affinities for non-nucleoside inhibitors to HIV-1 reverse transcriptase. J Med Chem. 2008;51(9):2648–2656. - PubMed
    1. Enyedy IJ, Egan WJ. Can we use docking and scoring for hit-to-lead optimization? J Comput Aided Mol Des. 2008;22:161–168. - PubMed
    1. Friesner RA, Murphy RB, Repasky MP, Frye LL, Greenwood JR, Halgren TA, Sanschagrin PC, Mainz DT. Extra Precision Glide: Docking and Scoring Incorporating a Model of Hydrophobic Enclosure for Protein-Ligand Complexes. J Med Chem. 2006;49(21):6177–6196. - PubMed
    1. Kolb P, Huang D, Dey F, Caflisch A. Discovery of kinase inhibitors by high-throughput docking and scoring based on a transferable linear interaction energy model. J Med Chem. 2008;51(5):1179–1188. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources