Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2009 May;113(5):1052-1057.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819ec97e.

Paracervical compared with intracervical lidocaine for suction curettage: a randomized controlled trial

Jennifer L Mankowski  1 , Jessica Kingston, Thomas Moran, Charles W Nager, Emily S Lukacz
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Paracervical compared with intracervical lidocaine for suction curettage: a randomized controlled trial

Jennifer L Mankowski et al. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the efficacy of paracervical compared with intracervical administration of local anesthesia during first-trimester suction curettage.

Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial comparing paracervical with intracervical lidocaine was performed in women undergoing elective first-trimester suction curettage with conscious sedation. Pain was assessed at baseline, with dilation, and with curettage using a 10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Assuming a minimal clinically important difference in pain score of 1.6 cm and a mean pain score (+/-standard deviation [SD]) of 4.7 (+/-2.9) cm for paracervical block, 120 patients would provide 80% power with an alpha of .05.

Results: For the 132 women randomly assigned, no significant differences in VAS scores (mean+/-SD) were observed between paracervical and intracervical blocks during dilation (2.6+/-2.3 compared with 2.8+/-2.2, P=.72) or curettage (3.9+/-2.9 compared with 3.3+/-2.5, P=.16).

Conclusion: For women undergoing first-trimester suction curettage with conscious sedation, there was no clinically meaningful difference in pain relief between paracervical and intracervical lidocaine. Providers should feel confident that both techniques provide equally effective and acceptable analgesia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

References

    1. Kan AS, Ng EH, Ho PC. The role and comparison of two techniques of paracervical block for pain relief during suction evacuation for first trimester pregnancy termination. Contraception 2004;70:159–63.
    1. Wiebe ER, Trouton KJ, Savoy E. Intra-cervical versus i.v. fentanyl for abortion. Hum Reprod 2005;20:2025–8.
    1. Miller L, Jensen MP, Stenchever MA. A double-blind randomized comparison of lidocaine and saline for cervical anesthesia. Obstet Gynecol 1996;87:600–4.
    1. Phair N, Jensen JT, Nichols MD. Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:1304–7.
    1. Grimes DA, Schulz KF, Cates W Jr, Tyler CW Jr. Local versus general anesthesia: which is safer for performing suction curettage abortions? Am J Obstet Gynecol 1979;135:1030–5.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources