Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;113(5):1117-1123.
doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2.

Uterine rupture in second-trimester misoprostol-induced abortion after cesarean delivery: a systematic review

Affiliations

Uterine rupture in second-trimester misoprostol-induced abortion after cesarean delivery: a systematic review

Vinita Goyal. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Objective: To determine the risk of uterine rupture when using misoprostol for second-trimester abortion in women with a history of cesarean delivery.

Data sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, and the Cochrane Library were searched systematically for all articles published before September 2008.

Methods of study selection: Sixty-three articles were found using the above data sources. I excluded case reports, narrative reviews or commentaries, studies that excluded women with a history of cesarean delivery, studies with unrelated outcomes, studies not conducted in humans, and studies that were not available in English. The remaining 16 studies that described misoprostol use for second-trimester abortion in women with a history of cesarean delivery were examined.

Tabulation, integration, and results: The number of participants with and without cesarean delivery, regimen of medical abortion used, and cases of uterine rupture were reviewed. To estimate the risk of uterine rupture in women with prior cesarean delivery undergoing second-trimester abortion with misoprostol and number needed to harm, I pooled the results of all 16 studies. The risk of uterine rupture in women with prior cesarean delivery was 0.28% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-1.00%). The risk of uterine rupture in women without prior cesarean delivery was 0.04% (95% CI 0.01-0.20%). Based on these risks, if 414 women with a history of cesarean delivery were given misoprostol for second-trimester abortion, one would experience uterine rupture.

Conclusion: The risk of uterine rupture among women with a prior cesarean delivery undergoing second-trimester abortion using misoprostol is less than 0.3%. This may be acceptable to both patients and providers.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Easterling TR, Martin DP. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2001;345:3–8.
    1. Plaut MM, Schwartz ML, Lubarsky SL. Uterine rupture associated with the use of misoprostol in the gravid patient with a previous cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:1535–42.
    1. Wing DA, Lovett K, Paul RH. Disruption of prior uterine incision following misoprostol for labor induction in women with previous cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1998;91:828–30.
    1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Induction of labor. ACOG Practice Bulletin 10. Washington (DC): ACOG; 1999.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The care of women requesting induced abortion: evidence-based clinical guideline number 7. London (UK): RCOG Press; 2004.

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources