Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study
- PMID: 19384192
- DOI: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e32832a9da7
Effects of force-titrated valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide versus amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide on ambulatory blood pressure in patients with stage 2 hypertension: the EVALUATE study
Abstract
Background: Previous studies using the combination of angiotensin-receptor blockers and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) have shown superior ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) reduction in study participants with stage 2 hypertension compared with monotherapy.
Objective: This multicenter, double-blind, parallel group, forced-titration study of individuals with stage 2 hypertension, compared the efficacy of valsartan and amlodipine in combination with HCTZ on ABP reduction.
Methods: After a 2-week washout period, participants (n=482) with mean office sitting systolic BP >or=160 mmHg and <or=200 mmHg were randomized to receive treatment with either valsartan 160 mg (n=241) or amlodipine 5 mg (n=241), force-titrated to a maximum dose of valsartan/HCTZ 320/25 mg or amlodipine/HCTZ 10/25 mg over 6 weeks and continued through week 10. The primary endpoint was change in mean 24-h ambulatory systolic BP from baseline to week 10.
Results: At week 10, changes from baseline in mean office BP were significantly (P<0.0001) decreased by both valsartan/HCTZ (-34.2/-14.2 mmHg) and amlodipine/HCTZ (-34.1/-14.7 mmHg). Changes from baseline in mean 24-h ABP were significantly (P<0.0001) decreased by both valsartan/HCTZ (-21.1/-12.5 mmHg) and amlodipine/HCTZ (-18.1/-9.9 mmHg). However, treatment with valsartan/HCTZ provided significant additional systolic BP (-3.8 mmHg; P=0.0042) and diastolic BP (-2.7 mmHg; P=0.0002) reduction compared with the amlodipine/HCTZ group. The proportion of individuals reaching the office goal BP (<140/80 mmHg) were similar in the valsartan/HCTZ (55.3%) versus amlodipine/HCTZ (54.9%) group, ABP control rates for the recommended ABP goal (<130/80 mmHg) were greater (P=0.0170) in the valsartan/HCTZ group (54.3%) than the amlodipine/HCTZ group (42.7%). Both treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusion: On the basis of ABP monitoring but not office measurements, the fixed-dose combination of valsartan/HCTZ is a significantly more effective treatment regimen than amlodipine/HCTZ, with similar tolerability.
Similar articles
-
Efficacy and tolerability of the combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine in a mild-to-moderately hypertensive Brazilian population.Blood Press Suppl. 2003 Dec;2:41-7. Blood Press Suppl. 2003. PMID: 14761076 Clinical Trial.
-
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003. Clin Ther. 2007. PMID: 17472820 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006. Clin Ther. 2005. PMID: 15978306 Clinical Trial.
-
Amlodipine/valsartan single-pill combination: a review of its use in the management of hypertension.Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009;9(5):309-30. doi: 10.2165/11201120-000000000-00000. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2009. PMID: 19791840 Review.
-
Clinical results with bisoprolol 2.5 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 6.25 mg combination in systolic hypertension in the elderly.J Hypertens Suppl. 2002 Feb;20(1):S21-5. J Hypertens Suppl. 2002. PMID: 11996196 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring compared with clinic and home blood pressure measures in evaluating moderate versus intensive treatment of hypertension with amlodipine/valsartan for patients uncontrolled on angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy.Blood Press Monit. 2011 Apr;16(2):87-95. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e328344c713. Blood Press Monit. 2011. PMID: 21386706 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Antihypertensive and metabolic effects of Angiotensin receptor blocker/diuretic combination therapy in obese, hypertensive African American and white patients.Am J Ther. 2013 Jan;20(1):2-12. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e318230ae66. Am J Ther. 2013. PMID: 22248871 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Aliskiren alone or in combination with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with the lower ranges of stage 2 hypertension: The ACQUIRE randomized double-blind study.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Dec;12(12):917-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00378.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010. PMID: 21122057 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Randomized study to compare valsartan +/- HCTZ versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ strategies to maximize blood pressure control.Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009;5:883-92. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.s8062. Epub 2009 Nov 2. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2009. PMID: 19898644 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
24-Hour ambulatory blood pressure response to combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide in stage 2 hypertension by ethnicity: the EVALUATE study.J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Nov;12(11):833-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00372.x. Epub 2010 Sep 24. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010. PMID: 21054769 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical