Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems
- PMID: 19384482
- PMCID: PMC2656972
- DOI: 10.1007/s10195-008-0105-4
Perspectives on metaphyseal conservative stems
Abstract
Total hip replacement is showing, during the last decades, a progressive evolution toward principles of reduced bone and soft tissue aggression. These principles have become the basis of a new philosophy, tissue sparing surgery. Regarding hip implants, new conservative components have been proposed and developed as an alternative to conventional stems. Technical and biomechanical characteristics of metaphyseal bone-stock-preserving stems are analyzed on the basis of the available literature and our personal experience. Mayo, Nanos and Metha stems represent, under certain aspects, a design evolution starting from shared concepts: reduced femoral violation, non-anatomic geometry, proximal calcar loading and lateral alignment. However, consistent differences are level of neck preservation, cross-sectional geometry and surface finishing. The Mayo component is the most time-tested component and, in our hands, it showed an excellent survivorship at the mid-term follow-up, with an extremely reduced incidence of aseptic loosening (partially reduced by the association with last generation acetabular couplings). For 160 implants followed for a mean of 4.7 years, survivorship was 97.5% with 4 failed implants: one fracture with unstable stem, 1 septic loosening and 2 aseptic mobilizations. DEXA analysis, performed on 15 cases, showed a good calcar loading and stimulation, but there was significant lateral load transfer to R3-R4 zones, giving to the distal part of the stem a function not simply limited to alignment. Metaphyseal conservative stems demonstrated a wide applicability with an essential surgical technique. Moreover, they offer the options of a "conservative revision" with a conventional primary component in case of failure and a "conservative revision" for failed resurfacing implants.
Figures









References
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1007/s10195-006-0120-2', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1007/s10195-006-0120-2'}]}
- Pipino F, Keller A (2006) Tissue-sparing surgery: 25 years’ experience with femoral neck preserving hip arthroplasty. J Orthop Traumatol 7(1):36–41
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '3354324', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3354324/'}]}
- Carlson L, Albrektsson B, Freeman MA (1988) Femoral neck retention in hip arthroplasty. A cadaver study of mechanical effects. Acta Orthop Scand 59(1):6–8 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '3452603', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3452603/'}]}
- Pipino F, Calderale PM (1987) Biodynamic total hip prosthesis. Ital J Orthop Traumatol 13(3):289–297 - PubMed
-
- {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '8436987', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8436987/'}]}
- Jasty M, Krushell R, Zalenski E, O’Connor D, Sedlacek R, Harris W (1993) The contribution of the nonporous distal stem to the stability of proximally porous-coated canine femoral components. J Arthroplasty 8(1):33–41 - PubMed
-
- Whiteside LA, White SE, McCarthy DS (1995) Effect of neck resection on torsional stability of cementless total hip replacement. Am J Orthop (10):766–770 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources