Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009;48(3):143-57.
doi: 10.2165/00003088-200948030-00001.

Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Affiliations
Review

Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Offie P Soldin et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009.

Abstract

Significant differences that exist between the sexes affect the prevalence, incidence and severity of a broad range of diseases and conditions. Men and women also differ in their response to drug treatment. It is therefore essential to understand these reactions in order to appropriately conduct risk assessment and to design safe and effective treatments. Even from that modest perspective, how and when we use drugs can result in unwanted and unexpected outcomes. This review summarizes the sex-based differences that impact on pharmacokinetics, and includes a general comparison of clinical pharmacology as it applies to men, women and pregnant women. Sex-related or pregnancy-induced changes in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination, when significant, may guide changes in dosage regimen or therapeutic monitoring to increase its effectiveness or reduce potential toxicity. Given those parameters, and our knowledge of sex differences, we can derive essentially all factors necessary for therapeutic optimization. Since this is a rapidly evolving area, it is essential for the practitioner to review drug prescribing information and recent literature in order to fully understand the impact of these differences on clinical therapeutics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Hardman JG, Limbird LE, Gilman AG. Goodman & Gilman’s The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2001.
    1. Zahm SH, Blair A, Weisenburger DD. Sex differences in the risk of multiple myeloma associated with agriculture. Br J Ind Med. 1992;49:815–6. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Messing K, Mager Stellman J. Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: the importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006;101:149–62. - PubMed
    1. Calabrese VP. A micromethod for absorption of specific antibody using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) J Neurosci Methods. 1984;11:137–41. - PubMed
    1. Calabrese EJ. Gastrointestinal and dermal absorption: interspecies differences. Drug Metab Rev. 1984;15:1013–32. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances