Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008 Sep;3(3):7-18.
doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.3.7.

Hidden Empirical Research Ethics: A Review of Three Health Journals from 2005 through 2006

James M Dubois  1 , Rebecca L Volpe, Erica K Rangel
Affiliations

Hidden Empirical Research Ethics: A Review of Three Health Journals from 2005 through 2006

James M Dubois et al. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Sep.

Abstract

WE HYPOTHESIZED THAT A SIGNIFICANT amount of empirical data pertinent to research ethics is currently inaccessible to research ethics committee or Institutuional Review Board (IRB) members for at least three reasons: it is published in non-ethics journals; articles are not adequately indexed using ethics-related keywords; and articles do not discuss the ethical significance of their data. We reviewed all articles from three health journals from January 2005 to December 2006, and identified 26 articles that contained data pertinent to research ethics. Only 7 articles contained keywords clearly related to research ethics; 15 of the articles contained no discussion of the ethical significance of their findings. Overall the articles we found constituted 2.2% of the research articles published in the three journals during the two-year period. If the same average number of articles were extrapolated to the top 100 of the approximately 5,000 journals indexed in MEDLINE, then at least 433 hidden ethics articles would be published each year. We conclude that better indexing of articles is needed, that IRB members and researchers need training to identify relevant data in the literature, and that IRB composition should include members from diverse disciplines familiar with ethics-relevant empirical data in their respective disciplines.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Altman DG, Schulz KF, Moher D, Egger M, Davidoff F, Elbourne D, Gøtzsche PC, Lang T CONSORT group. The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001;134(8):663–694. - PubMed
    1. Anttila H, Malmivaara A, Kunz R, Autti-Ramo I, Makela M. Quality of reporting of randomized, controlled trials in cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2006;117(6):2222–2230. - PubMed
    1. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, Horton R, Moher D, Olkin I, Pitkin R, Rennie D, Schulz KF, Simel D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1996;276(8):637–639. - PubMed
    1. Brahan D, Bauchner H. Changes in reporting race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, gender, and age over 10 years. Pediatrics. 2005;115(2):e163–e166. - PubMed
    1. Brassard P, Steensma C, Cadieux L, Lands LC. Evaluation of a school-based tuberculosis-screening program and associate investigation targeting recently immigrated children in a low-burden country. Pediatrics. 2006;117(2):e148–e156. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources