Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 22:9:112.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-112.

Action to achieve smoke-free homes: an exploration of experts' views

Affiliations

Action to achieve smoke-free homes: an exploration of experts' views

Deborah Ritchie et al. BMC Public Health. .

Abstract

Background: Smoking in the home is the major cause of exposure to second-hand smoke in children in the UK, particularly those living in low income households which have fewer restrictions on smoking in the home. Reducing children's exposure to second-hand smoke is an important public health and inequalities issue. Drawing on findings from a qualitative Scottish study, this paper identifies key issues and challenges that need to be considered when developing action to promote smoke-free homes at the national and local level.

Methods: Two panels of tobacco control experts (local and national) from Scotland considered the implications of the findings from a qualitative study of smokers and non-smokers (who were interviewed about smoking in the home), for future action on reducing smoking in the home.

Results: Several key themes emerged through the expert panel discussions. These related to: improving knowledge about SHS among carers and professionals; the goal and approach of future interventions (incremental/harm reduction or total restrictions); the complexity of the interventions; and issues around protecting children.

Conclusion: The expert panels were very aware of the sensitivities around the boundary between the 'private' home and public health interventions; but also the lack of evidence on the relative effectiveness of specific individual and community approaches on increasing restrictions on smoking in the home. Future action on smoke-free homes needs to consider and address these complexities. In particular health professionals and other key stakeholders need appropriate training on the issues around smoking in the home and how to address these, as well as for more research to evaluate interventions and develop a more robust evidence base to inform effective action on this issue.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Scottish Executive . A Breath of Fresh Air for Scotland- Improving Scotland's Health: The Challenge Tobacco Control Action Plan. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive; 2004.
    1. Bromley C, Sproston K, Shelton N. Scottish Health Survey 2003. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive; 2005.
    1. NHS Health Scotland . Community Health and Well-Being Profiles. Edinburgh: NHS Health Scotland; 2004.
    1. Plunkett M, Haw S, Cassels J, Moore M, O'Connor M. Smoking in Public Places – A survey of the Scottish leisure industry. Edinburgh: ASH Scotland/HEBS; 2000.
    1. Eadie D, Heim D, MacAskill S, Ross A, Hastings GA. A qualitative analysis of compliance with smoke-free legislation in community bars in Scotland; implications for public health. Addiction. 2008;103:1019–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02217.x. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances