Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 Jun;16(6):824-9.
doi: 10.1128/CVI.00084-09. Epub 2009 Apr 22.

Evaluation of a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect avian influenza virus antibodies in multiple experimentally infected avian species

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Evaluation of a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect avian influenza virus antibodies in multiple experimentally infected avian species

Justin D Brown et al. Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2009 Jun.

Abstract

Wild birds of the orders Anseriformes and Charadriiformes are the natural reservoirs for avian influenza (AI) viruses. Traditionally, AI virus surveillance in wild birds has relied on virus identification strategies, including virus isolation and detection. To evaluate the accuracy of a commercial blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (bELISA) and the agar gel immunodiffusion (AGID) test for detection of antibodies in wild birds, which is indicative of AI virus infection, we tested 281 serum samples from various wild avian species that were experimentally infected with AI viruses. Included in these samples were 178 samples from birds with confirmed AI virus infections (122 infected with low-pathogenic AI [LPAI] viruses and 56 infected with highly pathogenic AI [HPAI] viruses) and 103 samples from birds that were uninfected, negative controls. The sensitivities of the bELISA and the AGID test were 0.820 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.756 to 0.874) and 0.674 (95% CI, 0.600 to 0.742), respectively. Both tests had an estimated specificity of 1.00 (95% CI, 0.965 to 1.00). The bELISA was significantly more sensitive than the AGID test for both LPAI virus- and HPAI virus-infected birds. Both assays, however, had a higher sensitivity for birds infected with HPAI virus than for birds infected with LPAI virus. These results demonstrate the potential utility of the bELISA for detection of antibodies to both LPAI and HPAI viruses in multiple avian species, representing five avian orders and 17 genera. Additional studies are warranted to further evaluate the utility of the bELISA for use with naturally infected birds.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG. 1.
FIG. 1.
(A) Distribution of S/N absorbance ratios from the bELISA for serum samples from wild avian species inoculated with an AI virus (n = 178) (black) or a sham inoculum (n = 103) (gray). (B) Distribution of S/N absorbance values from the bELISA for birds infected with an LPAI virus (n = 122) (gray) or an HPAI virus (n = 56) (black).
FIG. 2.
FIG. 2.
ROC curve for a bELISA evaluated with a population of 103 uninfected wild birds and 178 wild birds with confirmed AI virus infection. Points on the curve correspond to different cutoff values (S/N ratios) for the test.

References

    1. Brown, J. D., D. E. Stallknecht, J. R. Beck, D. L. Suarez, and D. E. Swayne. 2006. The susceptibility of North American ducks and gulls to H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 121663-1670. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown, J. D., D. E. Stallknecht, S. Valeika, and D. E. Swayne. 2007. Susceptibility of wood ducks to H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza virus. J. Wildl. Dis. 43660-667. - PubMed
    1. Brown, J. D., D. E. Stallknecht, and D. E. Swayne. 2008a. Experimental infection of swans and geese with highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (H5N1) of Asian lineage. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 14136-142. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brown, J. D., D. E. Stallknecht, and D. E. Swayne. 2008b. Transmission of H5N1 high pathogenicity avian influenza virus to herring gulls (Larus argentatus) through intranasal inoculation of virus and ingestion of virus-infected chicken meat. Avian Pathol. 37393-397. - PubMed
    1. Cattoli, G., and I. Capua. 2007. Diagnosing avian influenza in the framework of wildlife surveillance efforts and environmental samples. J. Wildl. Dis. 43(Supplement)S35-S39.

Publication types