Performance of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of self-collected vaginal swabs obtained via an Internet-based screening program
- PMID: 19386838
- PMCID: PMC2691063
- DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02387-08
Performance of three nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of self-collected vaginal swabs obtained via an Internet-based screening program
Abstract
Use of self-obtained vaginal specimens processed by nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) has significantly increased the utilization of nontraditional locations for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae screening programs. One important emerging source of such venues includes home-based self-sampling kits available via the Internet. The objective of our study was to evaluate the performance of three commercially available NAATs (Becton-Dickinson ProbeTec SDA, Gen-Probe Aptima Combo2 TMA, and Roche Amplicor PCR) for detection of C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae in vaginal samples obtained via an Internet-based screening program. From July 2004 to August 2005, 500 self-collected vaginal swabs were tested for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae by using all three NAATs. Another 500 samples were collected between August 2005 and November 2007 and tested by ProbeTec and Combo2; PCR testing was discontinued due to low specificity for N. gonorrhoeae. All tests were conducted according to the manufacturers' procedures; the "gold standard" for an infected C. trachomatis or N. gonorrhoeae patient was defined as > or = 2 positive NAAT results. Of the first 500 swabs submitted, 46 were C. trachomatis infected (9.2%) and 5 were N. gonorrhoeae infected (1.0%), and 3 of these were coinfected (0.6%). All C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae Combo2-positive/ProbeTec-negative samples were confirmed as true positives by an alternative NAAT. For C. trachomatis, ProbeTec, Combo2, and PCR had sensitivities of 82.6%, 100%, and 100%, with specificities of 100%, 100%, and 99.3%, respectively. For N. gonorrhoeae, ProbeTec, Combo2, and PCR had sensitivities of 80%, 100%, and 100%, with specificities of 100%, 100%, and 98.8%, respectively. Of the total 1,000 swabs submitted, 92 were C. trachomatis infected (9.2%) and 15 were N. gonorrhoeae infected (1.5%), and 7 of these were coinfected (0.7%). There were no ProbeTec-positive/Combo2-negative samples. For C. trachomatis, ProbeTec and Combo2 had sensitivities of 81.5% and 100%, with specificities of 100% and 100%, respectively. For N. gonorrhoeae, ProbeTec and Combo2 had sensitivities of 80% and 100%, with specificities of 100% and 100%, respectively. Overall, ProbeTec had 17 C. trachomatis false-negative results (1.7%) and 3 N. gonorrhoeae false-negative results (0.3%), while Combo2 had none. Our results were consistent with the sensitivities and specificities stated by the manufacturers. NAATs perform well for detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea with self-obtained vaginal swabs shipped in a dry state to a laboratory. For 1,000 self-collected vaginal swabs tested by NAATs, the sensitivities for C. trachomatis and N. gonorrhoeae for Combo2 were 100% and 100%, while they were 81.5% and 80%, respectively, for ProbeTec. For 500 PCR samples, the C. trachomatis sensitivity was 100% and the N. gonorrhoeae sensitivity was 100%, with specificities of 99.3% and 98.8%, respectively.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of self-collected glans and rectal swabs from men who have sex with men for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by use of nucleic acid amplification tests.J Clin Microbiol. 2009 Jun;47(6):1657-62. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02269-08. Epub 2009 Apr 15. J Clin Microbiol. 2009. PMID: 19369445 Free PMC article.
-
Vaginal swabs are the specimens of choice when screening for Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: results from a multicenter evaluation of the APTIMA assays for both infections.Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Dec;32(12):725-8. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000190092.59482.96. Sex Transm Dis. 2005. PMID: 16314767
-
Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae by enzyme immunoassay, culture, and three nucleic acid amplification tests.J Clin Microbiol. 2001 May;39(5):1751-6. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.5.1751-1756.2001. J Clin Microbiol. 2001. PMID: 11325985 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Evaluation of the performance of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) in detection of chlamydia and gonorrhoea infection in vaginal specimens relative to patient infection status: a systematic review.BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 17;9(1):e022510. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022510. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 30659036 Free PMC article.
-
Molecular genetic methods for diagnosis and characterisation of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae: impact on epidemiological surveillance and interventions.APMIS. 2004 Nov-Dec;112(11-12):771-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11211-1205.x. APMIS. 2004. PMID: 15638837 Review.
Cited by
-
Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021 Jul 23;70(4):1-187. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.rr7004a1. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2021. PMID: 34292926 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae--2014.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014 Mar 14;63(RR-02):1-19. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014. PMID: 24622331 Free PMC article.
-
Decline in the prevalence of HIV and sexually transmitted infections among female sex workers in Benin over 15 years of targeted interventions.J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013 May 1;63(1):126-34. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e318286b9d4. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2013. PMID: 23337368 Free PMC article.
-
A pilot clinical validation study of a self-collected vaginal swab device for the detection of chlamydia trachomatis in women.Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Oct 4;10:1008761. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.1008761. eCollection 2022. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022. PMID: 36267446 Free PMC article.
-
Self-Collected versus Clinician-Collected Sampling for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Screening: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2015 Jul 13;10(7):e0132776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0132776. eCollection 2015. PLoS One. 2015. PMID: 26168051 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Blake, D., N. Maldeis, M. R. Barnes, A. Hardick, T. C. Quinn, and C. A. Gaydos. 2008. Cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis using cervical swabs, urine, and self-obtained vaginal swabs in a Sexually Transmitted Disease clinic setting. Sex. Transm. Dis. 35649-655. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2007. Sexually transmitted disease surveillance, 2006. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.
-
- Chernesky, M. A., E. W. Hook III, D. H. Martin, J. Lane, R. Johnson, J. A. Jordan, D. Fuller, D. E. Willis, P. M. Fine, W. M. Janda, and J. Schachter. 2005. Women find it easy and prefer to collect their own vaginal swabs to diagnose Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae infections. Sex. Transm. Dis. 32729-733. - PubMed
-
- Chernesky, M. A., H. Lee, J. Schachter, J. Burczak, W. E. Stamm, and W. M. McCormack. 1994. Rapid diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis urethral infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic men by testing first void urine in a ligase chain reaction assay. J. Infect. Dis. 1701308-1311. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical