Early failure of a Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement with lymphoreticular spread of metal debris: pre-operative diagnosis with MR
- PMID: 19386954
- DOI: 10.1259/bjr/32928628
Early failure of a Birmingham resurfacing hip replacement with lymphoreticular spread of metal debris: pre-operative diagnosis with MR
Abstract
Metal-on-metal hip replacements are the subject of much current debate. There is some evidence that there may be a hypersensitivity reaction, specific to metal-on-metal total hip replacements (THRs), which is associated with early failure of these prostheses. It has to date only been described in total replacements and not in metal-on-metal hip resurfacing. We present the case of a 68-year-old man who underwent bilateral metal-on-metal hip resurfacing for osteoarthrosis. The patient presented 6 months after surgery with pain and lateral thigh swelling. Pre-operative ultrasound and MRI demonstrated findings similar to those described in early failing metal-on-metal THRs, as well as evidence of lymphoreticular spread of metal debris. The operative findings included extensive aseptic soft-tissue necrosis. Histology revealed necrosis and a dense perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate along with metal debris within sinus histiocytes. The surgical, radiological and histological findings are similar to soft-tissue reactions described in metal-on-metal THRs.
Similar articles
-
Failure rates of metal-on-metal hip resurfacings: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.Lancet. 2012 Nov 17;380(9855):1759-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60989-1. Epub 2012 Oct 2. Lancet. 2012. PMID: 23036895
-
Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):746-54. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.29239. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012. PMID: 22628587
-
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty versus large-diameter head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty: comparison of three designs from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.Scand J Surg. 2014 Mar;103(1):54-9. doi: 10.1177/1457496913495345. Epub 2013 Dec 17. Scand J Surg. 2014. PMID: 24345980
-
Metal-on-metal bearings: the evidence so far.J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011 May;93(5):572-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.93B4.26429. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011. PMID: 21511920 Review.
-
Hip resurfacing arthroplasty: a review of the evidence for surgical technique, outcome, and complications.Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Apr;41(2):263-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2010.01.002. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010. PMID: 20399365 Review.
Cited by
-
Imaging Metal-on-Metal Hip Replacements: the Norwich Experience.HSS J. 2013 Oct;9(3):247-56. doi: 10.1007/s11420-013-9357-5. Epub 2013 Aug 24. HSS J. 2013. PMID: 24039614 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Grading the severity of soft tissue changes associated with metal-on-metal hip replacements: reliability of an MR grading system.Skeletal Radiol. 2011 Mar;40(3):303-7. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-1000-7. Epub 2010 Jul 25. Skeletal Radiol. 2011. PMID: 20658133 Clinical Trial.
-
Silent soft tissue pathology is common with a modern metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.Acta Orthop. 2011 Jun;82(3):301-7. doi: 10.3109/17453674.2011.579518. Epub 2011 Apr 19. Acta Orthop. 2011. PMID: 21504335 Free PMC article.
-
The role of ultrasound in the assessment of post-operative complications following hip arthroplasty.Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Sep;41(9):1035-46. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1390-9. Epub 2012 Mar 17. Skeletal Radiol. 2012. PMID: 22426776 Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical