The expression of receptivity markers in the fallopian tube epithelium
- PMID: 19387680
- DOI: 10.1007/s00418-009-0593-1
The expression of receptivity markers in the fallopian tube epithelium
Abstract
Pinopodes represent the morphological and integrins, the biomolecular markers of endometrial receptivity. We studied using scanning electron microscopy, the expression of pinopodes on tubal samples and their corresponding endometria, from 21 women of reproductive age (7 from proliferative phase, 7 from day LH +5 and 7 from day LH +7). In addition, we examined the immunohistochemical staining of integrins alpha v beta 3, alpha v beta 5 and their ligands, fibronectin (FN) and osteopontin (OPN) in the same tubal epithelium samples. Pinopodes were detected on the tubal epithelium exclusively during day LH +7, coincident with their formation in the endometrium and synchronous to alpha v beta 3 sharp increase in the oviduct epithelium, suggesting a regulation similar to the endometrium. In contrast, alpha v beta 5, FN and OPN remained unchanged during the cycle. These results show for the first time the formation of pinopodes in the tubal epithelium at the time of endometrial receptivity and correlate it with the upregulation of the intact dimmer alpha v beta 3 in the tubes.
Similar articles
-
Human fallopian tube epithelium constitutively expresses integrin endometrial receptivity markers: no evidence for a tubal implantation window.Mol Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;18(3):111-20. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gar068. Epub 2011 Oct 16. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012. PMID: 22002573 Free PMC article.
-
Synchronous expression of pinopodes and alpha v beta 3 and alpha 4 beta 1 integrins in the endometrial surface epithelium of normally menstruating women during the implantation window.J Reprod Med. 2003 May;48(5):355-61. J Reprod Med. 2003. PMID: 12815909
-
The expression of alpha(v) and beta3 integrin subunits in the normal human Fallopian tube epithelium suggests the occurrence of a tubal implantation window.Hum Reprod. 1998 Oct;13(1O):2916-20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.10.2916. Hum Reprod. 1998. PMID: 9804255
-
Pinopodes: a questionable role in endometrial receptivity.Hum Reprod Update. 2009 Mar-Apr;15(2):229-36. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmn052. Epub 2008 Nov 8. Hum Reprod Update. 2009. PMID: 18997181 Review.
-
Endometrial receptivity: changes in cell-surface morphology.Semin Reprod Med. 2000;18(3):229-35. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-12561. Semin Reprod Med. 2000. PMID: 11299962 Review.
Cited by
-
Extending the knowledge in histochemistry and cell biology.Histochem Cell Biol. 2010 Jan;133(1):1-40. doi: 10.1007/s00418-009-0665-2. Epub 2009 Nov 28. Histochem Cell Biol. 2010. PMID: 19946696 Review.
-
Investigating the role of oviductal mucosa-endometrial co-culture in modulating factors relevant to embryo implantation.Open Med (Wars). 2024 Dec 4;19(1):20241077. doi: 10.1515/med-2024-1077. eCollection 2024. Open Med (Wars). 2024. PMID: 39655054 Free PMC article.
-
The utility of human fallopian tube mucosa as a novel source of multipotent stem cells for the treatment of autologous reproductive tract injury.Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015 May 21;6(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13287-015-0094-1. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2015. PMID: 25994820 Free PMC article.
-
Human fallopian tube epithelium constitutively expresses integrin endometrial receptivity markers: no evidence for a tubal implantation window.Mol Hum Reprod. 2012 Mar;18(3):111-20. doi: 10.1093/molehr/gar068. Epub 2011 Oct 16. Mol Hum Reprod. 2012. PMID: 22002573 Free PMC article.
-
The incidence of ectopic/heterotopic pregnancies after blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers compared with that after cleavage-stage: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technologies Clinical Outcomes Reporting System study.F S Rep. 2021 Jul 3;2(4):421-427. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.06.010. eCollection 2021 Dec. F S Rep. 2021. PMID: 34934982 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous