The retrospective analysis of bibliographical trends for nine biomedical engineering journals from 1999 to 2007
- PMID: 19387834
- DOI: 10.1007/s10439-009-9700-7
The retrospective analysis of bibliographical trends for nine biomedical engineering journals from 1999 to 2007
Abstract
For academic research outcomes, there is an increasing emphasis on the bibliometric scorings like the journal impact factor (JIF) when assessment of the quality of research is required. Currently, no known study has been conducted to explore the bibliographical trends of the biomedical engineering journals indexed by the annual Journal Citation Reports of the Thomson Scientific. In this study, the trends of nine reputable journals were selected and analyzed over a 9-year period (year 1999 to year 2007). The results show that the JIF rose exponentially for some journals (up to 597.0%) while for others, it shrank (down to -19.5%). A similar trend is observed for the citations trend over the same period and there was a significant increase in the number of citable articles published (> or =23.6%) in all the selected journals using year 1999 as the base year. However, journals which published significant more non-research articles (> or =10%) saw favorable subsequent effects on their citations. It is postulated that the changes in bibliographical trends can be classified as editorial and non-editorial influences. The retrospective impacts of these influences on the nine selected journals over the 9-year period were also discussed in this study.
Similar articles
-
A 9-year analysis of bibliographical trends for journals in the subject category of general and internal medicine.Account Res. 2009 May;16(3):127-52. doi: 10.1080/08989620902984080. Account Res. 2009. PMID: 20183158
-
Effect of bibliographical classification on the impact factor of science- and engineering-based journals.Account Res. 2009 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/08989620802689516. Account Res. 2009. PMID: 19247850
-
A study on journal self-citations and intra-citing within the subject category of multidisciplinary sciences.Sci Eng Ethics. 2009 Dec;15(4):491-501. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9118-5. Epub 2009 Feb 27. Sci Eng Ethics. 2009. PMID: 19247812
-
The ups and downs of journal impact factors.Ann Occup Hyg. 2008 Mar;52(2):73-82. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/men002. Ann Occup Hyg. 2008. PMID: 18316351 Review.
-
The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):115-28. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.013. Epub 2006 Jun 19. Forensic Sci Int. 2007. PMID: 16784827 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of excessive journal self-citations: a case study on the Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica journal.Sci Eng Ethics. 2011 Mar;17(1):65-73. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9177-7. Epub 2009 Oct 2. Sci Eng Ethics. 2011. PMID: 19798588
-
Institute for Scientific Information-indexed biomedical journals of Saudi Arabia. Their performance from 2007-2014.Saudi Med J. 2016 Nov;37(11):1251-1257. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.11.15740. Saudi Med J. 2016. PMID: 27761565 Free PMC article.
-
A 10-year performance trajectory of top nutrition journals' impact factors.J Res Med Sci. 2012 Feb;17(2):128-32. J Res Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 23264784 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources