[Control of asthma symptoms and cellular markers of inflammation in induced sputum in children and adolescents with chronic asthma]
- PMID: 19388528
[Control of asthma symptoms and cellular markers of inflammation in induced sputum in children and adolescents with chronic asthma]
Abstract
After the GINA 2006 publication, asthma therapy is based on control of symptoms. However there are suggestions of monitoring of airway inflammation. Aim of the study was to compare clinical criteria of asthma control with cellular markers of lower airway inflammation in induced sputum in a group of young asthmatics. To assess relationship between sputum eosinophilia, asthma severity and spirometry.
Material and methods: A group of 154 young patients with chronic asthma (8-21 years) underwent sputum induction by inhalation of 4,5% saline solution. Sputum induction was effective in 121 patients (78%), and in this group control of clinical symptoms was assessed according to GINA 2006 criteria.
Results: Asthma was controlled in 82 subjects (67.8%) and uncontrolled in 39 (32.2%). Patients with controlled asthma had higher FEV1/FVC (79.8 +/- 7.1% vs 74.2 +/- 9.9%; p = 0.004) and MMEF (80.7 +/- 23.0% vs 65.3 +/- 21.8%; p < 0.001) than those with uncontrolled disease, but the average FEV1 (as percent predicted) did not differ between the two groups. Patients with controlled asthma had lower sputum eosinophil count than those with uncontrolled asthma (3.5 +/- 6.3% vs 7.2 +/- 8.7%; p = 0.01), but difference in neutrophil count was borderline (27.3 +/- 15.5% vs 34.5 +/- 21.0%; p = 0.05). High sputum eosinophil count (> 3%) was observed in 24.4% of patients with controlled asthma and in 61.5% with uncontrolled asthma (p < 0.001). Increased sputum neutrophil count was more frequent in a group of uncontrolled asthma (2.4 vs 15.4%; p = 0.022). Mean sputum eosinophil count was lower in patients with mild astma than in patients with moderate-severe disease (3.1 +/- 5.7% vs 7.1% +/- 8.8; p = 0.006). Patients with high sputum eosinophil count had lower FEV1 (89.4 +/- 14.9% vs 94.9 +/- 13.9%; p = 0.047), FEV1/FVC (74.5 +/- 10.1% vs 79.2 +/- 9.3%; p = 0.01) and MMEF (68.7 +/- 23.3% vs 81.7 +/- 23.1%; p = 0.004).
Conclusions: In this study of young asthmatics, control of asthma symptoms was observed in 67.8% of patients. However, cellular markers of lower airway inflammation were present in 1/4 of patients with controlled asthma and in 3/4 with uncontrolled disease. Sputum eosinophilia was related to asthma severity. FEV1/FVC and MMEF were more important that FEV1 for estimating control of asthma. Improvement of asthma control scoring is needed as well as availability of simple methods of inflammation monitoring.
Similar articles
-
Safety and application of induced sputum analysis in childhood asthma.J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004 Sep;114(3):575-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.036. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004. PMID: 15356559 Clinical Trial.
-
[Airway inflammation and peripheral airway function in asthmatic patients with different control levels].Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2009 Sep;32(9):679-84. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2009. PMID: 20079282 Chinese.
-
[Relation between clinical severity of bronchial asthma and degree of airway inflammation assessed by the eosinophilic leukocyte count in induced sputum].Vnitr Lek. 2001 Sep;47(9):604-8. Vnitr Lek. 2001. PMID: 11715664 Czech.
-
[Value of induced sputum in the investigation of asthma].Rev Mal Respir. 2003 Apr;20(2 Pt 1):215-23. Rev Mal Respir. 2003. PMID: 12844019 Review. French.
-
Inflammation in childhood asthma and other wheezing disorders.Pediatrics. 2002 Feb;109(2 Suppl):368-72. Pediatrics. 2002. PMID: 11826252 Review.