Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2007:5:19-24.
Epub 2007 Apr 1.

Exploratory Visual Analysis of statistical results from microarray experiments comparing high and low grade glioma

Affiliations

Exploratory Visual Analysis of statistical results from microarray experiments comparing high and low grade glioma

David M Reif et al. Cancer Inform. 2007.

Abstract

The biological interpretation of gene expression microarray results is a daunting challenge. For complex diseases such as cancer, wherein the body of published research is extensive, the incorporation of expert knowledge provides a useful analytical framework. We have previously developed the Exploratory Visual Analysis (EVA) software for exploring data analysis results in the context of annotation information about each gene, as well as biologically relevant groups of genes. We present EVA as a flexible combination of statistics and biological annotation that provides a straightforward visual interface for the interpretation of microarray analyses of gene expression in the most commonly occurring class of brain tumors, glioma. We demonstrate the utility of EVA for the biological interpretation of statistical results by analyzing publicly available gene expression profiles of two important glial tumors. The results of a statistical comparison between 21 malignant, high-grade glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors and 19 indolent, low-grade pilocytic astrocytomas were analyzed using EVA. By using EVA to examine the results of a relatively simple statistical analysis, we were able to identify tumor class-specific gene expression patterns having both statistical and biological significance. Our interactive analysis highlighted the potential importance of genes involved in cell cycle progression, proliferation, signaling, adhesion, migration, motility, and structure, as well as candidate gene loci on a region of Chromosome 7 that has been implicated in glioma. Because EVA does not require statistical or computational expertise and has the flexibility to accommodate any type of statistical analysis, we anticipate EVA will prove a useful addition to the repertoire of computational methods used for microarray data analysis. EVA is available at no charge to academic users and can be found at http://www.epistasis.org.

Keywords: annotation databases; biological interpretation; gene expression microarray; glioma; statistics; visualization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Genes whose expression levels discriminate between GBMs and pilocytic astrocytomas were identified using a combination of analysis of variance (ANOVA) and fold-change differences between tumor classes. These results were given to EVA as three separate statistics for each gene on the array: 1) the F test p-value, 2) the gene coded according to whether it had a significant fold-change and p-value < 0.01, and 3) the gene coded according to whether it had a significant negative fold-change and p-value < 0.01 or significant positive fold-change and p-value < 0.01.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Each square represents the p-value for a particular gene, organized according to Gene Ontology. The “cell adhesion” and “cell proliferation” groups have a relatively high number of highlighted gene squares, meaning that they contain a number of genes that have a fold-change difference greater than 1.5 and p-value < 0.01. The results of permutation tests that statistically verify this visual impression are listed in the log.

References

    1. Barry WT, Nobel AB, Wright FA. “Significance analysis of functional categories in gene expression studies: a structured permutation approach”. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(9):1943–1949. - PubMed
    1. Harris MA, Clark J, Ireland A, Lomax J, Ashburner M, Foulger R, Eilbeck K, Lewis S, Marshall B, Mungall C, Richter J, Rubin GM, Blake JA, Bult C, Dolan M, Drabkin H, Eppig JT, Hill DP, Ni L, Ringwald M, Balakrishnan R, Cherry JM, Christie KR, Costanzo MC, Dwight SS, Engel S, Fisk DG, Hirschman JE, Hong EL, Nash RS, Sethuraman A, Theesfeld CL, Botstein D, Dolinski K, Feierbach B, Berardini T, Mundodi S, Rhee SY, Apweiler R, Barrell D, Camon E, Dimmer E, Lee V, Chisholm R, Gaudet P, Kibbe W, Kishore R, Schwarz EM, Sternberg P, Gwinn M, Hannick L, Wortman J, Berriman M, Wood V, de la CN, Tonellato P, Jaiswal P, Seigfried T, White R.2004“The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource.” Nucleic Acids Res. 32Database issue:D258–D261. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hofmann TG, Stollberg N, Schmitz ML, Will H. “HIPK2 regulates transforming growth factor-beta-induced c-Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase activation and apoptosis in human hepatoma cells”. Cancer Res. 2003;63(23):8271–8277. - PubMed
    1. Kanehisa M, Goto S, Kawashima S, Okuno Y, Hattori M.2004“The KEGG resource for deciphering the genome.” Nucleic Acids Res. 32Database issue:D277–D280. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khatri P, Draghici S. “Ontological analysis of gene expression data: current tools, limitations, and open problems”. Bioinformatics. 2005;21(18):3587–3595. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources