Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;63(5):726-34.
doi: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2009.02049.x.

Self-reported diagnosis of heart disease: results from the SHIELD study

Collaborators, Affiliations
Free PMC article

Self-reported diagnosis of heart disease: results from the SHIELD study

S J Lewis et al. Int J Clin Pract. 2009 May.
Free PMC article

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the self-reported method of diagnosis of heart disease (HD) to elucidate whether diagnosis is occurring at early, presymptomatic stages as recommended by the prevention guidelines.

Methods: Respondents to the 2006 survey in the US population-based Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes (SHIELD) reported whether a physician told them that they had HD, including heart attack, angina, heart failure, angioplasty or heart bypass surgery. Self-report of age at diagnosis, specialty of physician who made the diagnosis and whether the diagnosis was made after having symptoms, during routine screening or while being treated for another health problem were assessed. Year of diagnosis was categorised into 3-year intervals from 1985 to 2006. Individuals with HD diagnosis with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) were compared using chi-square tests.

Results: Of 1573 respondents reporting a diagnosis of HD, > 87% were white, > 49% were men and 38% had T2DM. Approximately 19% of respondents reported that their HD diagnosis was made during routine screening. A significantly greater percentage of HD respondents with T2DM reported the diagnosis being made based on symptoms (54%) and while being treated for another health problem (22%) compared with respondents without diabetes (48% symptoms and 15% other health problem, p > 0.05). HD was diagnosed primarily by cardiologists (> 60%) and family doctors (> 25%).

Conclusion: There remains a missed opportunity to diagnose HD at earlier stages through routine screening or during treatment of other health conditions such as diabetes, as many individuals were not diagnosed until they were symptomatic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow of SHIELD surveys
Figure 3
Figure 3
Method of HD diagnosis for SHIELD respondents with HD and type 2 diabetes mellitus (n = 600). Respondents were permitted to check multiple responses
Figure 2
Figure 2
Method of HD diagnosis for SHIELD respondents with HD and no diabetes mellitus (n = 973). Respondents were permitted to check multiple responses

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Heart Association . Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics – 2007 Update. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2007.
    1. American Heart Association . Heart and Stroke Facts. Dallas, TX: American Heart Association; 2003.
    1. Grundy SM, Balady GJ, Criqui MH, et al. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: guidance from Framingham: a statement for healthcare professionals from the AHA Task Force on Risk Reduction. American Heart Association. Circulation. 1998;97:1876–87. - PubMed
    1. Buse JB, Ginsberg HN, Bakris GL, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases in people with diabetes mellitus: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Circulation. 2007;115:114–26. - PubMed
    1. Pearson TA, Blair SN, Daniels SR, et al. AHA Guidelines for Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke: 2002 Update: Consensus Panel Guide to comprehensive risk reduction for adult patients without coronary or other atherosclerotic vascular diseases. American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee. Circulation. 2002;106:388–91. - PubMed

Publication types