Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur
- PMID: 19396579
- DOI: 10.1007/s10103-009-0672-5
Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the microleakage of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites in class V cavities prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser and bur. Class V cavities were prepared on both buccal and lingual surfaces of 72 premolars by Er:YAG laser or bur and divided into six groups (n = 24). The occlusal margins were enamel and the cervical margins were cementum. The groups were as follows: group 1 Er:YAG laser preparation (E) + Xeno V (X) + CeramX (C); group 2 bur preparation (B) + X + C; group 3 E + AdheSE One (A) + Tetric EvoCeram (T); group 4 B + A + T; group 5 E + Clearfil S3 Bond (CSB) + Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (CME); group 6 B + CSB + CME. All teeth were stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 24 h, then thermocycled 500 times (5-55 degrees C). Ten teeth from each group were chosen for the microleakage investigation and two teeth for the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation. The teeth that were prepared for the microleakage test were immersed in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye for 24 h. After immersion, the teeth were sectioned and observed under a stereomicroscope for dye penetration. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (P < 0.05). Bur-prepared cavities presented less microleakage in all groups for enamel (P < 0.05); however, in cervical margins, there were no differences between laser-prepared and bur-prepared cavities in the Xeno V + CeramX and AdheSE One + Tetric EvoCeram groups (P > 0.05). SEM observations of restorative material-dentin interfaces seemed to correspond with those of the microleakage test. Microleakage at the cervical interfaces was greater than that at the occlusal interfaces. Er:YAG laser-prepared class V cavities yielded more microleakage in occlusal margins with all-in-one self-etch adhesives and the respective manufacturer's nanocomposites.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study.Microsc Res Tech. 2016 Oct;79(10):998-1004. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22735. Epub 2016 Jul 29. Microsc Res Tech. 2016. PMID: 27472905
-
Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.Lasers Med Sci. 2013 Nov;28(6):1453-60. doi: 10.1007/s10103-012-1222-0. Epub 2012 Nov 8. Lasers Med Sci. 2013. PMID: 23135785
-
Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.Photomed Laser Surg. 2009 Oct;27(5):783-9. doi: 10.1089/pho.2008.2313. Photomed Laser Surg. 2009. PMID: 19754249
-
Microleakage of Self-Etch Adhesive System in Class V Cavities Prepared by Using Er:YAG Laser with Different Pulse Modes.Photomed Laser Surg. 2015 Sep;33(9):467-72. doi: 10.1089/pho.2015.3926. Epub 2015 Aug 13. Photomed Laser Surg. 2015. PMID: 26270129
-
Effect of the erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser or diamond bur cavity preparation on the marginal microleakage of class V cavities restored with different adhesives and composite systems.Lasers Med Sci. 2012 Jul;27(4):785-94. doi: 10.1007/s10103-011-0981-3. Epub 2011 Aug 16. Lasers Med Sci. 2012. PMID: 21845398
Cited by
-
Evaluation of Microleakage under Orthodontic Brackets Bonded with Nanocomposites.Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):361-366. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_69_18. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018. PMID: 30166827 Free PMC article.
-
Application of Laser Irradiation for Restorative Treatments.Open Dent J. 2016 Nov 16;10:636-642. doi: 10.2174/1874210601610010636. eCollection 2016. Open Dent J. 2016. PMID: 27990188 Free PMC article.
-
Marginal microleakage of cervical composite resin restorations bonded using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives: two dimensional vs. three dimensional methods.Restor Dent Endod. 2016 May;41(2):83-90. doi: 10.5395/rde.2016.41.2.83. Epub 2016 Apr 18. Restor Dent Endod. 2016. PMID: 27200275 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of three adhesive systems in class II composite restorations in endodontically treated teeth: Influence of Er:YAG laser conditioning and gingival margin levels on microleakage.J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Aug 1;10(8):e781-e788. doi: 10.4317/jced.54843. eCollection 2018 Aug. J Clin Exp Dent. 2018. PMID: 30305877 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of Tooth Preparation via Er:YAG Laser and Bur on Microleakage of Dentin Adhesives.J Dent (Tehran). 2014 Mar;11(2):172-8. Epub 2014 Mar 31. J Dent (Tehran). 2014. PMID: 24910693 Free PMC article.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources