Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;11(1):43-51.
doi: 10.1080/17482940802588317.

Clinical evaluation of a fully automated model-based algorithm to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography

Affiliations

Clinical evaluation of a fully automated model-based algorithm to calculate left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using multidetector computed tomography

Eduard Ghersin et al. Acute Card Care. 2009.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate feasibility and accuracy of a fully automatic algorithm (FAA) for calculating left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction (LVEF) from multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) studies versus a previously validated method based on Simpson's method serving as our reference standard (RS), and left ventriculography (LVG), in patients with acute chest pain (ACP).

Methods: 23 patients admitted with ACP underwent ECG-gated MDCT, as well as LVG during their hospitalization. MDCT based end-diastolic, end-systolic and stroke volumes (EDV, ESV, SV) and LVEF were calculated using the RS and the FAA.

Results: One patient was excluded after FAA failure to detect contours. In the remaining 22 patients, mean+/-SD LVEF measurements were RS 61+/-11%, FAA 59+/-11% (r = 0.91 versus RS), LVG 57+/-16% (r = 0.6 versus RS). In comparison to RS, FAA overestimated EDV by 10.1+/-8.5 ml, ESV by 7.3+/-6.4 ml and SV by 3.6+/-8.6 ml, and underestimated LVEF measurements by 2.7+/-4.6%, related to contour smoothing. LVEF by FAA was within 8% of RS for all patients except one. In contrast, LVG differed significantly from RS.

Conclusions: The evaluated FAA obtained accurate, clinically relevant results for left ventricular volumes and LVEF relative to the RS.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms