Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study
- PMID: 19398386
- PMCID: PMC3775665
- DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005
Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study
Abstract
Background context: The prevalence of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) in the general population and association with low back pain (LBP) remain unclear.
Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of congenital and acquired LSS observed on computed tomography in a community-based sample; and to evaluate the association between LSS and LBP.
Study design/setting: Cross-sectional observational study. This study was an ancillary project to the Framingham Heart Study.
Patient sample: A total of 3,529 participants underwent multidetector computed tomography; 191 were enrolled in this study.
Outcome measures: Self-report measures: LBP in the preceding 12 months was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire. Physiologic measures: LSS (congenital and acquired) was characterized using two cut-points: 12mm for relative LSS and 10mm for absolute LSS.
Methods: Using multiple logistic regression, we examined the association between LSS and LBP, adjusting for sex, age, and body mass index.
Results: In the congenital group, relative LSS was found in 4.7% and absolute LSS in 2.6% of patients. Acquired LSS was found in 22.5% and in 7.3%, respectively. Acquired LSS showed increasing prevalence with age less than 40 years, the prevalence of relative and absolute LSS was 20.0% and 4.0%, respectively, and in those 60 to 69 years the prevalence was 47.2% and 19.4%, respectively. The presence of absolute LSS was associated with LBP with an odds ratio of 3.16 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.05-9.53).
Conclusions: The prevalence of congenital and acquired LSS in a community-based sample was characterized. The prevalence of acquired stenosis increased with age. LSS is associated with a threefold higher risk of experiencing LBP.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- De Villiers PD, Booysen EL. Fibrous spinal stenosis. A report on 850 myelograms with a water-soluble contrast medium. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976:140–144. - PubMed
-
- Roberson GH, Llewellyn HJ, Taveras JM. The narrow lumbar spinal canal syndrome. Radiology. 1973;107:89–97. - PubMed
-
- Fanuele JC, Birkmeyer NJ, Abdu WA, Tosteson TD, Weinstein JN. The impact of spinal problems on the health status of patients: have we underestimated the effect? Spine. 2000;25:1509–1514. - PubMed
-
- Gunzburg R, Keller TS, Szpalski M, Vandeputte K, Spratt KF. A prospective study on CT scan outcomes after conservative decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:261–267. - PubMed
-
- Arnoldi CC, Brodsky AE, Cauchoix J, Crock HV, Dommisse GF, Edgar MA, et al. Lumbar spinal stenosis and nerve root entrapment syndromes. Definition and classification. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976:4–5. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
