Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May 19;100(10):1530-3.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605049. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer

Affiliations

Positive lymph node retrieval ratio optimises patient staging in colorectal cancer

S J Moug et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Alternative lymph node (LN) parameters have been proposed to improve staging in colorectal cancer. This study compared these alternative parameters with conventional TNM staging in predicting long-term survival in patients undergoing curative resection. A total of 295 consecutive patients (mean age 70 years; range 39-95; s.d. 10.4) underwent resection for colorectal cancer from 2001 to 2004. Age, sex, primary tumour site, TNM stage and chemotherapy/radiotherapy were recorded. Patients with colon and rectal cancers were analysed separately for LN parameters: LN total; adequate LN retrieval (> or =12) and inadequate (<12); total number of negative LN; total number of positive LN and the ratio of positive LN to total LN (pLNR). Univariate and multivariate survival analysis was performed. The median number of LN retrieved was 10 (1-57) with adequate LN retrieval in 147 cases (49.8%). For each T and N stage, inadequate LN retrieval did not adversely affect long-term survival (P>0.05). On multivariate analysis, only pLNR was an independent predictor of overall survival in both colon and rectal cancers (HR 11.65, 95% CI 5.00-27.15, P<0.001 and HR 13.40, 95% CI 3.64-49.10, P<0.001, respectively). Application of pLNR subdivided patients into four prognostic groups. Application of the pLNR improved patient stratification in colorectal cancer and should be considered in future staging systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Differences in overall survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer when classified by positive lymph node ratios.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences in overall survival in patients undergoing curative resection for rectal cancer when classified by positive lymph node ratios.

References

    1. Berger AC, Sigurdson ER, LeVoyer T, Hanlon A, Mayer RJ, Macdonald JS, Catalano PJ, Haller DG (2005) Colon cancer survival is associated with decreasing ratio of metastatic to examined lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol 23: 8706–8712 - PubMed
    1. Caplin S, Cerottini JP, Bosman FT, Constanda MT, Givel JC (1998) For patients with Dukes’ B (TNM Stage II) colorectal carcinoma, examination of six or fewer lymph nodes is related to poor prognosis. Cancer 83: 666–672 - PubMed
    1. Chang GJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Skibber JM, Moyer VA (2007) Lymph node evaluation and survival after curative resection of colon cancer: systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 99: 433–441 - PubMed
    1. De Ridder M, Vinh-Hung V, Van Nieuwenhove Y, Hoorens A, Sermeus A, Strome G (2006) Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio in node positive colon cancer. Gut 55: 1681 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edler D, Ohrling K, Hallstrom M, Karlberg M, Ragnhammar P (2007) The number of analyzed lymph nodes—a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Acta Oncol 46: 975–981 - PubMed

Publication types