Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2009 May 19;100(10):1566-74.
doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605053. Epub 2009 Apr 28.

Pattern and quality of care of cancer pain management. Results from the Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group

G Apolone  1 , O Corli, A Caraceni, E Negri, S Deandrea, M Montanari, M T Greco; Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (CPOR SG) Investigators
Collaborators, Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Pattern and quality of care of cancer pain management. Results from the Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group

G Apolone et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Most patients with advanced or metastatic cancer experience pain and despite several guidelines, undertreatment is well documented. A multicenter, open-label, prospective, non-randomised study was launched in Italy in 2006 to evaluate the epidemiology, patterns and quality of pain care of cancer patients. To assess the adequacy of analgesic care, we used a standardised measure, the pain management index (PMI), that compares the most potent analgesic prescribed for a patient with the reported level of the worst pain of that patient together with a selected list of clinical indicators. A total of 110 centres recruited 1801 valid cases. 61% of cases were received a WHO-level III opioid; 25.3% were classified as potentially undertreated, with wide variation (9.8-55.3%) according to the variables describing patients, centres and pattern of care. After adjustment with a multivariable logistic regression model, type of recruiting centre, receiving adjuvant therapy or not and type of patient recruited (new or already on follow-up) had a significant association with undertreatment. Non-compliance with the predefined set of clinical indicators was generally high, ranging from 41 to 76%. Despite intrinsic limitations of the PMI that may be considered as an indicator of the poor quality of cancer pain care, results suggest that the recourse to WHO third-level drugs still seems delayed in a substantial percentage of patients. This delay is probably related to several factors affecting practice in participating centres and suggests that the quality of cancer pain management in Italy deserves specific attention and interventions aimed at improving patients' outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Pain management index.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Synopsis of the stages of the study.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Percentages (95% confidence interval) of patients with negative PMI in all the combinations among levels of recruiting centres, adjuvant therapy and time of recruiting.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Apolone G, Bertetto O, Caraceni A, Corli O, De Conno F, Labianca R, Maltoni M, Nicora M, Zucco F, Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (2006a) Pain in cancer. An outcome research project to evaluate the epidemiology, the quality and the effects of pain treatment in cancer patients. Health Qual Life Outcomes 14: 4–7 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Apolone G, Mangano S, Compagnoni A, Negri E, Mosconi P, Mannino S, Villa M, Zuccaro P, Cancer Pain Outcome Research Study Group (CPOR SG) (2006b) A Multidisciplinary Project to improve the quality of cancer pain management in Italy. Background, methods, and preliminary results. J Ambul Care Manage 29: 332–341 - PubMed
    1. Apolone G, Mosconi P, Colombo P, Tamburini M (2004) Il dolore nel paziente con cancro: un progetto di ricerca. Ricerca Pratica 20: 137–143
    1. Apolone G, Corli O, Greco MT, Zagonel V (2008) Factors influencing the decision to take or reject opioids for cancer pain: are we on target? Ann Oncol 19(5): 1021–1022 - PubMed
    1. Brink-Huis A, van Achterberg T, Schoonhoven L (2008) Pain management: a review of organisation models with integrated processes for the management of pain in adult cancer patients. J Clin Nurs 17: 1986–2000 - PubMed

Publication types