Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2008;102(10):613-7.
doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2008.11.015.

[Training requirements, expertise and basic conditions of committed medical educators in Germany]

[Article in German]
Affiliations

[Training requirements, expertise and basic conditions of committed medical educators in Germany]

[Article in German]
Sören Huwendiek et al. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2008.

Abstract

Background: Despite an increasing interest in undergraduate, postgraduate and continuing medical education, little is known about the training requirements, expertise and basic conditions of medical educators. Against this backdrop, we initiated a web-based survey amongst members of the "Gesellschaft für Medizinische Ausbildung" (German Section of the Association for Medical Education in Europe) e.V. (GMA).

Methods: We conducted a web-based survey designed to answer the following questions: How do medical educators judge (1) their training requirements, (2) their expertise and (3) basic conditions. 147 out of 373 members of the GMA e-mailing list responded to the questionnaire (overall response rate: 39%).

Results: The following were rated as high-priority training needs: development in medical education research methodology (56% of survey participants), student assessment (37%), supporting self-directed learning (35%), and computer-based training (32%). The highest level of expertise [Likert Scale: 1 = very low to 5 = very high] was perceived in: general teaching principles (3.76 +/- 0.74), curriculum development (3.74 +/- 0.95), student assessment (3.65 +/- 0.97] and evaluation of courses and curricula [3.65 +/- 0.9]. Regarding basic conditions, respondents noted a particular need for more funding in medical education [4.26 +/- 0.88] and more recognition of merits in medical education [4.20 +/- 0.92].

Conclusions: The survey respondents identified more training in research methodology and more academic recognition and funding as important challenges in the field of medical education.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types