Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 May;15(5):710-8.
doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081119.

A case-control study on the origin of atypical scrapie in sheep, France

Affiliations

A case-control study on the origin of atypical scrapie in sheep, France

Alexandre Fediaevsky et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009 May.

Abstract

A matched case-control study (95 cases and 220 controls) was designed to study risk factors for atypical scrapie in sheep in France. We analyzed contacts with animals from other flocks, lambing and feeding practices, and exposure to toxic substances. Data on the prnp genotype were collected for some case and control animals and included in a complementary analysis. Sheep dairy farms had a higher risk for scrapie (odds ratio [OR] 15.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3-69.7). Lower risk was associated with organic farms (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.02-1.26), feeding corn silage (OR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.53), and feeding vitamin and mineral supplements (OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.32-1.14). Genetic effects were quantitatively important but only marginally changed estimates of other variables. We did not find any risk factor associated with an infectious origin of scrapie. Atypical scrapie could be a spontaneous disease influenced by genetic and metabolic factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of cases of atypical scrapie and controls (no. cases/no. controls) in sheep, France, 2007. Sheep production areas are outlined in black, and counties are outlined in gray.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Distribution of C0 for cases of atypical scrapie and controls in sheep, France, 1994–2005. C0, birth cohort assuming that in each flock all animals born during the same birth campaign (defined from July 1 of year n – 1 to June 30 of year n) shared the same exposure.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of control weightings calculated as the ratio of the percentage of flocks with >20 ewes in the county over the average percentage of flocks with >20 ewes for atypical scrapie in sheep, in France, 2007. Ranges represent classes of weightings.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. European Food Safety Authority. Opinion of the scientific panel on biological hazards on classification of atypical transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) cases in small ruminants (question no. EFSA-Q-2005–073) adopted on 26 October 2005. Report of the Working Group. The European Food Safety Authority Journal. 2005;276:1–30.
    1. Benestad SL, Sarradin P, Thu B, Schönheit J, Tranulis MA, Bratberg B. Cases of scrapie with unusual features in Norway and designation of a new type Nor98. Vet Rec. 2003;153:202–8. - PubMed
    1. Benestad SL, Arsac JN, Goldmann W, Noremark M. Atypical/Nor98 scrapie: properties of the agent, genetics, and epidemiology. Vet Res. 2008;39:19. - PubMed
    1. Detwiler LA, Baylis M. The epidemiology of scrapie. Revue Scientifique et Technique de l’Office International des Epizooties. 2003;22:121–43. - PubMed
    1. Konold T, Davis A, Bone G, Bracegirdle J, Everitt S, Chaplin M, et al. Clinical findings in two cases of atypical scrapie in sheep: a case report. BMC Vet Res. 2007;3:2. 10.1186/1746-6148-3-2 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources