Bateman's principles and human sex roles
- PMID: 19403194
- PMCID: PMC3096780
- DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.02.005
Bateman's principles and human sex roles
Erratum in
- Trends Ecol Evol. 2013 Oct;28(10):622
Abstract
In 1948, Angus J. Bateman reported a stronger relationship between mating and reproductive success in male fruit flies compared with females, and concluded that selection should universally favour 'an undiscriminating eagerness in the males and a discriminating passivity in the females' to obtain mates. The conventional view of promiscuous, undiscriminating males and coy, choosy females has also been applied to our own species. Here, we challenge the view that evolutionary theory prescribes stereotyped sex roles in human beings, firstly by reviewing Bateman's principles and recent sexual selection theory and, secondly, by examining data on mating behaviour and reproductive success in current and historic human populations. We argue that human mating strategies are unlikely to conform to a single universal pattern.
Figures
References
-
- Darwin C. John Murray; 1871. The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex.
-
- Bateman A.J. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity. 1948;2:349–368. - PubMed
-
- Trivers R.L. Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Campbell B., editor. Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man, 1871–1971. Aldine; 1972. pp. 136–179.
-
- Emlen S.T., Oring L.W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977;197:215–223. - PubMed
-
- Clutton-Brock T.H., Parker G.A. Potential reproductive rates and the operation of sexual selection. Q. Rev. Biol. 1992;67:437–456.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
