Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Oct;467(10):2570-6.
doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0859-x. Epub 2009 Apr 30.

Role of technology assessment in orthopaedics

Affiliations

Role of technology assessment in orthopaedics

Charles Turkelson et al. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Oct.

Abstract

A technology assessment is a literature-based research project that seeks to determine whether a medical device, drug, procedure, or biologic is effective or to summarize literature on a given technology. A well-conducted assessment is a form of secondary research that employs the same steps used in primary research studies (ie, well-designed clinical trials). The primary difference is that in technology assessment the investigator does not collect the raw data. Rather, (s)he must use data collected by someone else. Nevertheless, a well-designed assessment, like a well-designed study, employs the scientific method, which is a method designed to combat bias. When there is little available information, such as with new technologies, unbiased examinations can typically show that enthusiasm for that technology is not backed by much data. When there is more information, assessments can not only determine whether a technology is effective, but also how effective it is. Technology assessments can provide busy orthopaedic surgeons (who do not have the time to keep up with and critically evaluate current literature) with succinct information that enables them to rapidly determine what is and what is not known about any given medical technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1001/jama.268.2.240', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.268.2.240'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '1535110', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1535110/'}]}
    2. Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. Treatments for myocardial infarction. JAMA. 1992;268:240–248. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC428525', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC428525/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15205295', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15205295/'}]}
    2. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann HJ, Edejer TT, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1186/1472-6963-4-38', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-4-38'}, {'type': 'PMC', 'value': 'PMC545647', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC545647/'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '15615589', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15615589/'}]}
    2. Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, GRADE Working Group. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res. 2004;4:38. - PMC - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'DOI', 'value': '10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.007', 'is_inner': False, 'url': 'https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.02.007'}, {'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '18620840', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18620840/'}]}
    2. Bachmann LM, ter RG, Weber WE, Kessels AG. Multivariable adjustments counteract spectrum and test review bias in accuracy studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:357–361. - PubMed
    1. {'text': '', 'ref_index': 1, 'ids': [{'type': 'PubMed', 'value': '10309422', 'is_inner': True, 'url': 'https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10309422/'}]}
    2. Banta HD, Behney CJ, Sisk JS. Toward Rational Technology in Medicine. New York, NY: Springer; 1981. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms