Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research
- PMID: 19405972
- PMCID: PMC2681473
- DOI: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-29
Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research
Abstract
Background: Systematic review and meta-analysis currently underpin much of evidence-based medicine. Such methodologies bring order to previous research, but future research planning remains relatively incoherent and inefficient.
Methods: To outline a framework for evaluation of health interventions, aimed at increasing coherence and efficiency through i) making better use of information contained within the existing evidence-base when designing future studies; and ii) maximising the information available and thus potentially reducing the need for future studies.
Results: The framework presented insists that an up-to-date meta-analysis of existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should always be considered before future trials are conducted. Such a meta-analysis should inform critical design issues such as sample size determination. The contexts in which the use of individual patient data meta-analysis and mixed treatment comparisons modelling may be beneficial before further RCTs are conducted are considered. Consideration should also be given to how any newly planned RCTs would contribute to the totality of evidence through its incorporation into an updated meta-analysis. We illustrate how new RCTs can have very low power to change inferences of an existing meta-analysis, particularly when between study heterogeneity is taken into consideration.
Conclusion: While the collation of existing evidence as the basis for clinical practice is now routine, a more coherent and efficient approach to planning future RCTs to strengthen the evidence base needs to be developed. The framework presented is a proposal for how this situation can be improved.
Figures


Similar articles
-
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12. Early Hum Dev. 2020. PMID: 33036834
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
Empirical assessment suggests that existing evidence could be used more fully in designing randomized controlled trials.J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Sep;63(9):983-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.022. Epub 2010 Jun 22. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010. PMID: 20573483 Review.
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50. Pain Physician. 2009. PMID: 19787009
Cited by
-
Methods used to assess outcome consistency in clinical studies: A literature-based evaluation.PLoS One. 2020 Jul 8;15(7):e0235485. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235485. eCollection 2020. PLoS One. 2020. PMID: 32639999 Free PMC article.
-
Is the information of systematic reviews published in nursing journals up-to-date? a cross-sectional study.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Nov 25;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0432-3. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017. PMID: 29178832 Free PMC article.
-
The use of systematic reviews in the planning, design and conduct of randomised trials: a retrospective cohort of NIHR HTA funded trials.BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 25;13:50. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-13-50. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013. PMID: 23530582 Free PMC article.
-
The inclusion of real world evidence in clinical development planning.Trials. 2018 Aug 29;19(1):468. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2769-2. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30157904 Free PMC article.
-
Contour plot assessment of existing meta-analyses confirms robust association of statin use and acute kidney injury risk.J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Oct;68(10):1138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.05.030. Epub 2015 Jun 16. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015. PMID: 26092287 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. The Cochrane Library. 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5.
-
- Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D. Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie. 2000;23(6):597–602. - PubMed
-
- Clarke L, Clarke M, Clarke T. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2007;12:101–103. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources