Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009 Apr 30:9:29.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-29.

Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research

Affiliations

Evidence synthesis as the key to more coherent and efficient research

Alexander J Sutton et al. BMC Med Res Methodol. .

Abstract

Background: Systematic review and meta-analysis currently underpin much of evidence-based medicine. Such methodologies bring order to previous research, but future research planning remains relatively incoherent and inefficient.

Methods: To outline a framework for evaluation of health interventions, aimed at increasing coherence and efficiency through i) making better use of information contained within the existing evidence-base when designing future studies; and ii) maximising the information available and thus potentially reducing the need for future studies.

Results: The framework presented insists that an up-to-date meta-analysis of existing randomised controlled trials (RCTs) should always be considered before future trials are conducted. Such a meta-analysis should inform critical design issues such as sample size determination. The contexts in which the use of individual patient data meta-analysis and mixed treatment comparisons modelling may be beneficial before further RCTs are conducted are considered. Consideration should also be given to how any newly planned RCTs would contribute to the totality of evidence through its incorporation into an updated meta-analysis. We illustrate how new RCTs can have very low power to change inferences of an existing meta-analysis, particularly when between study heterogeneity is taken into consideration.

Conclusion: While the collation of existing evidence as the basis for clinical practice is now routine, a more coherent and efficient approach to planning future RCTs to strengthen the evidence base needs to be developed. The framework presented is a proposal for how this situation can be improved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow-chart for proposed cyclic, coherent and efficient research synthesis/research design strategy for answering questions of clinical importance. * Ideally based on a clinically-centred criteria such as limits of equivalence (rather than statistical significance).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Fixed effect meta-analysis from home safety education and provision of safety equipment for injury prevention systematic review for the outcome storage of matches or lighters out of reach of children.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ. 1996;312:71–72. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. The Cochrane Library. 3. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions 4.2.5.
    1. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D. Improving the quality of reporting of meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Onkologie. 2000;23(6):597–602. - PubMed
    1. Clarke M. Doing new research? Don't forget the old. PLoS Medicine. 2004;1(2):e35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clarke L, Clarke M, Clarke T. How useful are Cochrane reviews in identifying research needs? Journal of Health Services Research & Policy. 2007;12:101–103. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources