Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 May 1;103(9):1275-9.
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.01.024. Epub 2009 Mar 9.

Usefulness of a combination of systolic function by left ventricular ejection fraction and diastolic function by E/E' to predict prognosis in patients with heart failure

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Usefulness of a combination of systolic function by left ventricular ejection fraction and diastolic function by E/E' to predict prognosis in patients with heart failure

Kumiko Hirata et al. Am J Cardiol. .

Abstract

Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) was known as a conventional predictor of heart failure (HF). However, early transmitral flow velocity (E)/early diastolic velocity of mitral annulus (E') correlated well with LV end-diastolic pressure, and E/E' ratio >15 was an excellent predictor of adverse outcomes in patients with HF. This study was designed to determine the prognostic value of a new combined index, E/E' ratio and LVEF, in patients with HF. One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients hospitalized with HF underwent comprehensive echocardiographic-Doppler study when ready for discharge. Patients were divided into the 4 groups of group I (LVEF >40% and E/E' ratio <15), group II (EF >40% and E/E' ratio >or=15), group III (EF <or=40% and E/E' ratio <15), and group IV (EF <or=40% and E/E' ratio >or=15). The ability of this index to determine the primary end point (rehospitalization for HF or cardiac death) was assessed. Patients with significant valvular disease were excluded. Of 126 patients, 110 met the inclusion criteria. Follow-up was complete for 108 of 110 patients at 351 +/- 252 days after discharge. There were 27, 30, 21, and 30 patients in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. There were 52 patients with the primary end point. On univariate analysis, E/E' ratio, group IV, E', and age were significant predictors. In multivariable analysis, the most powerful independent prognostic indicator of events was group IV (hazard ratio 12.6, 95% confidence interval 2.2 to 74.2, p = 0.005). In conclusion, a new index, a combination of LVEF and E/E' ratio, allowed the identification of patients at higher risk of readmission and cardiac death in patients with HF.

PubMed Disclaimer

Publication types

MeSH terms