Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 May;4(5):899-906.
doi: 10.2215/CJN.05371008. Epub 2009 Apr 30.

Estimating glomerular filtration rate: Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas compared to renal inulin clearance

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Estimating glomerular filtration rate: Cockcroft-Gault and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formulas compared to renal inulin clearance

Rossini Botev et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Evaluation of renal function by estimation of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is very important for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). The Cockcroft-Gault (CG) and Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formulas are the most commonly used estimations.

Design, setting, participants, & measurements: Estimated GFR values by each formula were compared with measured GFR (mGFR) by renal inulin clearance in 2208 European adults (46% women, 1.4% Caribbean blacks), with and without CKD, and mean mGFR 72.4 +/- 39.0 (range 2.2 to 177.2) ml/min/1.73 m(2).

Results: Overall, the CG and MDRD formulas showed bias (mean difference) -3.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (5.3%), P < 0.001, and -9.8 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (-6.4%), P < 0.001; precision (SD of bias) 21.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (43.1%) and 20.0 ml/min/1.73 m(2) (33.0%); limits of agreement (2 SD by Bland-Altman method) 39.5 to -46.5 (range 86.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2) and 30.2 to -49.8 (range 80.0) ml/min/1.73 m(2); and accuracy within +/-30% of mGFR 70.8 and 69.0%, respectively. Both formulas showed a trend for decreasing accuracy with lower mGFR levels. According to the Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI)-CKD classification's five GFR groups, the CG and MDRD formulas properly assigned 61.6 and 57.1% of the entire population and had a range of positive predictive values 42.6 to 81.8% and 39.6 to 85.2% and of negative predictive values 81.7 to 96.6% and 76.4 to 97.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: The CG and MDRD formulas had some limitations for proper GFR estimation and K/DOQI-CKD classification by GFR levels alone.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Relation between serum creatinine concentration and measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by renal inulin clearance.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Relation of measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by renal inulin clearance and estimated GFR (eGFR) by (A) Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula and (B) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Trend line in bold; r2, variability coefficient.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Bland and Altman plots comparing measured glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by renal inulin clearance and estimated GFR (eGFR) by (A) Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula and (B) Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula. Bold lines define upper (+2 SD) and lower (−2 SD) limits of agreement; dashed lines represent mean difference between eGFR and inulin GFR.

Comment in

  • eGFR: Readjusting its rating.
    Glassock RJ, Winearls CG. Glassock RJ, et al. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 May;4(5):867-9. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01830309. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009. PMID: 19414566 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Smith HW: The reliability of inulin as a measure of glomerular filtration. In: The Kidney: Structure and Function in Health and Disease, New York, Oxford University Press, pp 231-238, 1951
    1. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification. Am J Kidney Dis 39[Suppl 1]: S1–S266, 2002 - PubMed
    1. Levey AS: Measurement of renal function in chronic renal disease. Kidney Int 38: 167–184, 1990 - PubMed
    1. Gaspari F, Perico N, Remuzzi G: Application of newer clearance techniques for the determination of glomerular filtration rate. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 7: 675–680, 1998 - PubMed
    1. Kemperman FA, Krediet RT, Arisz L: Formula-derived prediction of the glomerular filtration rate from plasma creatinine concentration. Nephron 91: 547–558, 2002 - PubMed

MeSH terms