How to effectively implement an indicator system to improve performance from a management perspective: the case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system
- PMID: 19408455
- DOI: 10.1007/s10916-008-9182-4
How to effectively implement an indicator system to improve performance from a management perspective: the case of Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system
Abstract
This study uses the Taiwan Healthcare Indicator Series (THIS) system as an example to examine which determinants would improve performance by sharing indicators from a management perspective. This study population included all 227 hospitals participating in the THIS system in 2006. A structured questionnaire was sent to the director who was responsible for the THIS system via electronic mail. A total of 111 responses were returned by February 10, 2006. Questions included current implementation and impacts of the system. Hierarchical regression models were performed to identify which variables were significantly associated with performance improvement, adjusted for hospital characteristics. Four variables significantly associated with implementing the THIS system to improve performance were 'senior management support,' 'benchmarking,' 'making departments improve the underperforming indicators and report the improvement results in performance management meetings,' and 'integration with the National Health Insurance payment regulations'. This study contributes substantially to the evidence base about what works to improve performance by information sharing. Although information sharing is the basis of efforts to improve performance, senior management support and how to effectively apply the information are the most important determinants of performance enhancement.
Similar articles
-
Development and implementation of a nationwide health care quality indicator system in Taiwan.Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Feb;19(1):21-8. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl063. Epub 2006 Nov 23. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007. PMID: 17124255
-
Developing and Trialling an independent, scalable and repeatable IT-benchmarking procedure for healthcare organisations.Methods Inf Med. 2013;52(4):360-9. doi: 10.3414/ME12-02-0016. Epub 2013 Jul 23. Methods Inf Med. 2013. PMID: 23877646
-
Hospital response to public reporting of quality indicators.Health Care Financ Rev. 2007 Spring;28(3):61-76. Health Care Financ Rev. 2007. PMID: 17645156 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Balanced Scorecard for the monitoring of hospital performance in the countries of the Greater Maghreb. Systematic Review.Tunis Med. 2018 Oct-Nov;96(10-11):774-788. Tunis Med. 2018. PMID: 30746671
-
Quality management in midwifery practice.Semin Nurse Manag. 1998 Sep;6(3):149-54. Semin Nurse Manag. 1998. PMID: 9887866 Review.
Cited by
-
A knowledge based search tool for performance measures in health care systems.J Med Syst. 2012 Feb;36(1):201-21. doi: 10.1007/s10916-010-9459-2. Epub 2010 Apr 14. J Med Syst. 2012. PMID: 20703735
-
A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characteristics that influence the implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: implications for infection prevention and control.J Infect Prev. 2020 May;21(3):84-96. doi: 10.1177/1757177420907696. Epub 2020 May 4. J Infect Prev. 2020. PMID: 32494292 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Value of Performance Measurement in Promoting Improvements in Women's Health.Healthc Policy. 2009 Nov;5(2):52-67. Healthc Policy. 2009. PMID: 21037826 Free PMC article.
-
Do relationships exist between the scope and intensity of quality improvement activities and hospital operation performance? A 10-year observation in Taiwan.BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Aug 14;15:327. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-0961-6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015. PMID: 26271997 Free PMC article.