[Presence of parents in the emergency room during invasive procedures: do they prefer to be present?]
- PMID: 19409240
- DOI: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.10.017
[Presence of parents in the emergency room during invasive procedures: do they prefer to be present?]
Abstract
Introduction: Parents are not usually present during procedures in the paediatric emergency room (ER), although an increasing number of them would like to. Our goal was to find out how parents felt about them being present in ER during procedures.
Material and methods: This is an observational study. Questionnaires were distributed among parents of patients in the ER during January and February 2007. Data included demographic questions as well as the opinion regarding their preference on being present during venipuncture, stitching, lumbar puncture or cardiopulmonary resuscitation. They were also asked about who should take the decision whether to allow the family to be present or not.
Results: A total of 98 questionnaires were analyzed. The median age of participants was 32 years-old, of which 84.5% would prefer to be present for venipuncture, 70.4% for stitching, 66.3% for lumbar puncture and 61.2% for cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Venipuncture was performed on 21% of the children, stitching on 4%, and lumbar puncture on 2%. There was no cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Parents considered that the decision about being present should be taken by the professional in 74% (venipuncture), 75% (stitching), 80% (lumbar puncture) and 81% (cardiopulmonary resuscitation). The mean age of the group that preferred to be present was lower (32 vs. 40 years; p = 0.039).
Conclusions: Most parents surveyed preferred to be present during invasive procedures in ER. The more invasive the procedure is the higher reluctance from parents to be present. Most parents thought the decision should be taken by the health care professional, particularly when the procedure is more invasive.
Similar articles
-
Witnessing invasive paediatric procedures, including resuscitation, in the emergency department: a parental perspective.Emerg Med Australas. 2005 Jun;17(3):244-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2005.00730.x. Emerg Med Australas. 2005. PMID: 15953226
-
Parental presence during invasive procedures and resuscitation: attitudes of health care professionals in Turkey.Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006 Apr;22(4):230-4. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000210178.86504.80. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2006. PMID: 16651911
-
Do family members interfere in the delivery of care when present during invasive paediatric procedures in the emergency department?Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Jun;19(3):234-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.00962.x. Emerg Med Australas. 2007. PMID: 17564691
-
[Parental presence during invasive procedures in the emergency department].An Pediatr (Barc). 2009 Mar;70(3):293-6. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2008.09.005. Epub 2008 Dec 6. An Pediatr (Barc). 2009. PMID: 19409248 Review. Spanish.
-
Family member presence in the pediatric emergency department.Curr Opin Pediatr. 2003 Jun;15(3):294-8. doi: 10.1097/00008480-200306000-00012. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2003. PMID: 12806260 Review.
Cited by
-
Effect of Midazolam Alone Versus Midazolam with Maternal Presence on Pain and Anxiety of Lumbar Puncture in 6 to 24-Month-Old Children.Iran J Child Neurol. 2020 Winter;14(1):57-64. Iran J Child Neurol. 2020. PMID: 32021629 Free PMC article.
-
Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper.Can Respir J. 2015 Jul-Aug;22(4):201-5. doi: 10.1155/2015/532721. Epub 2015 Jun 17. Can Respir J. 2015. PMID: 26083541 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical