Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2009 May-Jun;54(3):226-37.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmwh.2009.02.003.

Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review

Affiliations
Review

Women's experience of prenatal care: an integrative review

Gina Novick. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2009 May-Jun.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to identify, synthesize, and critically analyze published research on women's experiences of prenatal care. A search of online databases and relevant citations for research published from 1996 to 2007 was conducted. Thirty-six articles were reviewed. Qualitative analysis methods were used, assisted by research software. This review found that some women were treated respectfully and reported comprehensive, individualized care. However, some women experienced long waits and rushed visits, and perceived prenatal care as mechanistic or harsh. Women's preferences included reasonable waits, unhurried visits, continuity, flexibility, comprehensive care, meeting with other pregnant women in groups, developing meaningful relationships with professionals, and becoming more active participants in care. Some low-income and minority women experienced discrimination or stereotyping and external barriers to care. Further research is recommended to understand women's experiences and to develop and implement evidence-based, women-centered approaches. Clinicians should inquire regarding women's needs and modify care accordingly and also advocate for institutional changes that reduce barriers to care. Implementing comprehensive, redesigned models of care may be one effective way to simultaneously address a variety of women's needs and preferences. If prenatal care becomes more attractive and more accessible, women's experience and pregnancy outcomes may both improve.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Alexander GR, Kotelchuck M. Assessing the role and effectiveness of prenatal care: History, challenges, and directions for future research. Public Health Rep. 2001;116:306–16. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Hauth JC, Gilstrap LC, Wenstrom KD. Williams obstetrics. 22nd ed. MrGraw-Hill; New York, NY: 2005.
    1. Mikhail BI. Perceived impediments to prenatal care among low-income women. West J Nurs Res. 1999;21(3):335–50. - PubMed
    1. Sword W. Prenatal care use among women of low income: A matter of “taking care of self”. Qual Health Res. 2003;13(3):319–32. - PubMed
    1. Bucher L, Williams S, Hayes E, Morin K, Sylvia B. First-time mothers’ perceptions of prenatal care services. Appl Nurs Res. 1997 May;10(2):64–71. - PubMed

Publication types