Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2009 May 6:9:29.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-29.

Diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency: comparison of pituitary stalk interruption syndrome and transient GH deficiency

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency: comparison of pituitary stalk interruption syndrome and transient GH deficiency

Murielle Louvel et al. BMC Pediatr. .

Abstract

Background: Most patients with childhood non-organic growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) produce a normal GH peak as young adults. Our objectives were to better define this transient GHD and evaluate the factors influencing the growth response of patients with pituitary stalk interruption syndrome (PSIS).

Methods: We studied 72 prepubertal patients with a GH peak < 6.7 ng/ml after 2 stimulation tests, treated with 0.2 mg GH/kg/w for at least 3 years. Group 1 (n = 53, 4.7 +/- 4.0 years) had PSIS and Group 2 (n = 19, 9.2 +/- 3.0 years) had transient GHD and normal pituitary.

Results: At diagnosis, 64% of Group 1 and one Group 2 were < 5 years old. The growth rate of 59% Group 1 and two Group 2 patients was < or = -2 SDS. The GH peak of 64% Group 1 patients and no Group 2 patients was < 3 ng/ml. The plasma insulin-like growth factor-1 of all Group 1 and all but one Group 2 patients was < or = -2 z scores.During the first year of GH treatment, the growth rate was > or = 2 SDS in 81% Group 1 and 37% Group 2 patients. In Group 1, it was negatively correlated with the GH peak before treatment (P < 0.03), and with the difference between the target and adult heights (P < 0.01).The height gain SDSs between diagnosis and adult height were 1.7 +/- 1.2 in Group 1 (n = 30) and 1.08 +/- 0.8 in Group 2 (n = 12, P = 0.05).

Conclusion: The factors of the growth response to GH treatment should be analysed separately for each population: with and without PSIS or other markers.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Characteristics at diagnosis.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Growth rates before and during the first three years of GH treatment.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Annual changes in height during the first three years of GH treatment.

References

    1. Argyropoulou M, Pérignon F, Brauner R, Brunelle F. Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency. J Pediatr. 1992;120:886–891. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)81955-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Badaru A, Wilson DM. Alternatives to growth hormone stimulation testing in children. Trends in Endocrinol Metab. 2004;15:252–258. doi: 10.1016/j.tem.2004.06.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Castro C, Trivin C, Souberbielle JC, Zerah M, Brauner R. Growth hormone deficiency: permanence and diagnosis in young adults. Horm Res. 2002;58:165–171. doi: 10.1159/000065489. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trivin C, Souberbielle JC, Aubertin G, Lawson-Body E, Adan L, Brauner R. Diagnosis of idiopathic growth hormone deficiency: contributions of data on the acid-labile subunit, insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I & II and IGF binding protein – 3. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2006;19:481–489. - PubMed
    1. Marin G, Domené HM, Barnes KM, Blackwell BJ, Cassorla FG, Cutler GB., Jr The effects of estrogen priming and puberty on the growth hormone response to standardized treadmill exercise and arginine-insulin in normal girls and boys. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79:537–541. doi: 10.1210/jc.79.2.537. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources