Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2009;4(5):e5451.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005451. Epub 2009 May 6.

A tale of four "carp": invasion potential and ecological niche modeling

Affiliations

A tale of four "carp": invasion potential and ecological niche modeling

Shannon C DeVaney et al. PLoS One. 2009.

Abstract

Background: Invasive species are a serious problem in ecosystems, but are difficult to eradicate once established. Predictive methods can be key in determining which areas are of concern regarding invasion by such species to prevent establishment [1]. We assessed the geographic potential of four Eurasian cyprinid fishes (common carp, tench, grass carp, black carp) as invaders in North America via ecological niche modeling (ENM). These "carp" represent four stages of invasion of the continent (a long-established invader with a wide distribution, a long-established invader with a limited distribution, a spreading invader whose distribution is expanding, and a newly introduced potential invader that is not yet established), and as such illustrate the progressive reduction of distributional disequilibrium over the history of species' invasions.

Methodology/principal findings: We used ENM to estimate the potential distributional area for each species in North America using models based on native range distribution data. Environmental data layers for native and introduced ranges were imported from state, national, and international climate and environmental databases. Models were evaluated using independent validation data on native and invaded areas. We calculated omission error for the independent validation data for each species: all native range tests were highly successful (all omission values <7%); invaded-range predictions were predictive for common and grass carp (omission values 8.8 and 19.8%, respectively). Model omission was high for introduced tench populations (54.7%), but the model correctly identified some areas where the species has been successful; distributional predictions for black carp show that large portions of eastern North America are at risk.

Conclusions/significance: ENMs predicted potential ranges of carp species accurately even in regions where the species have not been present until recently. ENM can forecast species' potential geographic ranges with reasonable precision and within the short screening time required by proposed U.S. invasive species legislation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Niche models in native ranges and in the United States.
Ecological niche models for common carp (A, B), tench (C, D), grass carp (E, F), and black carp (G, H) on native and U.S. landscapes. Shading indicates the predicted suitability predicted (brick red = 7–10 models, canary red = 4–6 models, pink = 1–3 models). Occurrence points for each species are shown as training data (yellow circles) in the species' native range (A, C, E, G) or independent validation data (green triangles) in the native or introduced ranges (B, D, F, H).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Invasive range predictions by USGS hydrologic unit.
Mean ecological niche model predictions at the level of hydrologic unit (USGS 6-digit HUC) in the United States, for common carp (A), tench (B), grass carp (C), and black carp (D). Shade indicates mean suitability from the niche model outputs across all pixels within each HUC polygon (see legend). Known (testing) occurrence points are indicated by dotted circles. Recently captured black carp , are shown with stars (D).

References

    1. NAS. Predicting Invasions of Nonindigenous Plants and Plant Pests. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences; 2002. - PubMed
    1. Invasive Species. 1999. pp. 6183–6186. Federal Register.
    1. Cox GW. Conservation Ecology. William C. Brown Publishers; 1993.
    1. Drake JA, Mooney HA, diCastri F, Groves RH, Kruger FJ, et al. Biological invasions: a global perspective. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
    1. Harmful non-indigenous species in the United States. 1993. In: U.S. Congress OoTA, editor: U.S. Government Printing Office.